Examination
Flat earth. Maps of the world in different countries map of the UN and flat earth How to join the flat earth society

Flat earth. Maps of the world in different countries map of the UN and flat earth How to join the flat earth society

It is hardly possible to fully reveal the incomprehensible secrets of the universe. And even what at first glance seems to be an immutable truth, in some cases can turn out to be very controversial. for the sake of political, economic and moral-ethical interests no longer causes such surprise, because the concept alternative history every day there are more and more adherents. And even those who recently believed in fairy tales about the existence of Peter I, today are no longer so confident in supporting their beliefs.

What if it's not just history that's distorted? Modern geography, geodesy and other sciences have elevated the idea that the Earth is round to the rank of an axiom, however, this theory also has its opponents. At first glance, the idea of a flat Earth can be perceived as a joke, but its adherents are providing more and more convincing evidence in favor of their theory, which looks quite logical and justified. Is this so, or is science not lying in this case? Who knows…

Flat Earth Theory: Basic Concepts

The essence of this theory is revealed by its very name. According to the assumptions of flat-earthers, the globe is a round disk, the center of which is the North Pole. But in principle, the South Pole is not on this map - instead of it there is a high ice wall that encircles the territory of the Earth. What is behind this wall is a mystery. Some suggest that behind it there is only ice and permafrost, others believe that a parallel life of other inhabitants of the planet is hidden there, while still others believe that the wall serves as a fence behind which there is absolutely nothing. A map that clearly shows the device flat earth, is called azimuthal.

The diameter of the planet is 40,000 kilometers. Above this huge disk, like a dome, rise the constellations, the Sun and the Moon. And so that the day goes on as usual, and day gives way to night, it is not the planet itself that rotates, but the dome located directly above it. That is why the constellations move during the night, the bright sun is replaced by a mysterious and cold moon, and sunrise and sunset regularly alternate.

And since the Sun is constantly moving, the usual ideas about the solar system have no right to exist. In the Flat Earth concept, the Solar system is not considered in principle, since the Sun rotates at a breakneck speed, and the planets simply could not follow it and rotate relative to own axis. The gravitational force of the planets also serves as a weighty argument. According to modern scientists, the Earth ranks third among the planets located around the Sun. But according to the laws of physics, the force of gravity is directly related to mass, which means that the smaller the size of the planet, the closer it should be to the Sun. After carrying out simple mathematical calculations, you can understand that the Earth should be not in third, but in sixth place. Then our world would be shrouded in permafrost, because the atmosphere simply physically would not be able to warm up enough to comfortably support life.

But if everything works exactly as the adherents of the Flat Earth theory see it, what about space flights, numerous photographs of the Earth taken from outer space, data about other planets and other information that clearly demonstrates the structure of the universe. According to flat-earthers, all this is nothing more than a fiction, a staged act, and a deception on a huge scale. The illusion created by the Freemasons makes it possible to hide the truth from the population. One of the proofs of this assumption is a photograph of Apollo 11, in which the Americans allegedly flew to the Moon. With a detailed magnification, you can see that the spacecraft is made of “available materials” - foil, planks, oilcloth, cardboard, etc. In fact, this is just a set designed for filming the astronauts, who, by the way, did not even bother to take off their jewelry (bracelets and rings), on which the engraved letter G can be seen inside a compass and square - a symbol of the Masonic movement.

What about pictures of Mars? The unreal and mysterious beauty of this mysterious planet according to adherents of the Flat Earth theory - nothing more than photo filters, a play of light and shadows, classical computer programs, which any “advanced” student can work with. If you remove the Photoshop effects from these pictures, you will get very beautiful, but still very real landscapes, taken in remote corners of the Earth, untouched by human hands.

A little history, or Where does the flat Earth theory come from?

At first glance, it may seem that the theory about the flat shape of our planet is nothing more than fashion trend, of which there are now quite a few on the Internet. However, this is not at all true: looking through the prism of history, you can track how opinions about the shape of the Earth have changed. Mention of this theory was found in the ancient mythology of Egypt and Babylon, Hindu and Buddhist scriptures, and Scandinavian epic. And even the ancient philosophers, whose teachings are considered historical heritage, among whom Leucippus and his student Democritus, were firmly convinced that the Earth was flat. The same idea was adhered to in the oldest manuscript of the Book of Enoch, found at Qumran. However, over time, these beliefs gave way to astronomical knowledge, and the idea of a Flat Earth fell into oblivion.

In the Middle Ages, the question of the shape of the Earth again became debated. One of the striking examples of this idea was “Christian Topography”, written by Cosmas Indicopleus in 535-547. In it, the planet is presented in the form of a rectangular plane, on top of which there is a dome: “Some people, hiding behind the name of Christians, claim, along with pagan philosophers, that the Sky has a spherical shape. No doubt these people are deceived by the eclipses of the Sun and Moon." This work, translated, became widespread in Rus', because at that time it was a unique encyclopedia of medieval knowledge, which there was no reason not to believe.

One of the clear examples of the theory was an engraving published in the book “Atmosphere: Popular Meteorology”, published by the French astronomer Camille Flammarion in 1888. It depicts a pilgrim who has reached the edge of the Earth and looks out from under the dome towards new worlds. The caption for the image reads: “A medieval missionary says he found the point where the sky touches the Earth.”

How did the Flat Earth Society come about?

In the 19th century, adherents of the described concept united into a group - the Flat Earth Society - headed by the English scientist Samuel Rowbotham. For several decades, he conducted all kinds of experiments, experiments, studies to confirm his theory and, importantly, found a lot of evidence. Using the pseudonym Parallax, he wrote “Zetetic Astronomy,” in which he thoroughly and clearly outlined all his findings and results refuting the spherical shape of the planet. Rowbotham's initially small work was reprinted several times, becoming increasingly large-scale and evidence-based literature, because it was constantly supplemented by students of the Society. Until his death, Samuel Rowbotham defended his theory, giving numerous lectures and seminars around the world.

Adherents of Rowbotham's theory subsequently united into the Universal Zetetic Society, which found its adherents in all corners of the planet. Since 1956, this organization, led by Samuel Shenton, again became known as the Flat Earth Society, but with the significant prefix “International”. When Shenton saw photographs of the globe from orbit, he did not doubt his convictions for a moment: “It is easy to see how photographs of this kind can fool an ignorant person.”

Since 1971, the head of the organization has been Charles Johnson. He launched a major campaign to promote his ideas, distributing leaflets, publishing brochures and booklets in which he advocated the flat Earth model. Thanks to such activity, during his leadership the number of supporters of the theory increased several times.

Arguments for the Flat Earth Theory

To make an informed decision about the shape of our planet, you need to consider the arguments on both sides to see which makes the most sense and consistency. So, what do flat earthers say about their theory?

1.Earth's rotation speed.

Scientific data says that the Earth rotates around its axis at a speed of about half a kilometer per second. It’s hard to even imagine such a fast object! There are several arguments in favor of flat earthers simple experiments, for example, with a jump. Everyone knows that when a person jumps, he lands in the same place. But what about rotation? After all, in those split seconds that he was in the jump, the planet had to move a considerable distance, and the landing site would have become another point. The same result is obtained by firing a cannon into the sky. In addition, if you shoot to the east (against the direction of rotation), the cannonball should fly half as far as normal, and if you shoot to the west, twice as much. However, this does not happen. And pilots flying over the Earth have never recorded how it rotates, although who, if not them, should be able to see the change in the position of the planet from above.

2.Perfectly flat horizon.

Look into the distance. Take a good look, not losing sight of the slightest detail. What do you see? The ideally smooth edge of the horizon in the area where it is clearly visible - fields, meadows, sea surface - cannot deceive. After all, in a free area the view spans several kilometers in the distance, so why are they perfectly level? According to adherents of the theory, the answer is obvious - the Earth is flat! In addition, tall objects (for example, towers, lighthouses, mountain peaks) would simply not be visible, because the spherical surface would hide them from an attentive eye, since the horizon line would be significantly higher. But this does not happen, and you can admire the mountains from a very long distance, amounting to more than one kilometer.

3.Air travel routes.

Many flights, especially long-distance ones, at first glance seem illogical from the point of view of the spherical shape of the Earth. Looking at the globe, one might wonder why pilots choose such a seemingly illogical route and inconvenient refueling points. However, there is no mystery or irrationalism in this: if we compare these routes with flat map, it becomes clear that the route is laid out perfectly.

4. Star drawing.

If all objects in the Universe are in constant motion, then why are the stars in the sky located exactly the same both today and several centuries ago? After all, in theory, the star pattern should change, if not every day, then certainly once a week. However, this does not happen. The thing is that stars are just holograms on the heavenly dome, which cannot change, move relative to each other, much less fall. And the famous meteor shower, which all the romantics of the world eagerly await to make a wish, is a holographic effect.

5. Yellow Sun.

Scientific laws explain in some detail why the sky is blue and the Sun is yellow. According to official data, ultraviolet light, passing through the atmosphere, is scattered into spectra, one of which colors the sky. However, this does not explain in any way why some of the rays concentrated around the Sun do not decay, because then it should be blue-blue. Isn't it the case that the Sun is below the dome-sky, which limits space. Rotating around the Earth, it alternately illuminates the territory, so the light hours regularly replace each other.

6. Space flights- a hoax.

None of the flat-earthers have seen outer space with their own eyes, which means that one can argue its existence until one is hoarse. The photographs are fake, the videos are all special effects, and the space flights are fantastic stories. Convinced adherents of this theory even organized several investigative expeditions to search for photographic sites “on the Moon.” And when the astronauts were asked to swear Holy Scripture that they were on the Moon, they all showed aggression and avoided answering.

7. Free flow of rivers.

According to the law of communicating vessels, the network of reservoirs enveloping the Earth simply could not exist on a spherical planet in the form in which we see it today. However, rivers flow to the west, east, north and south in almost equal quantities, and their depth and fullness are in no way related to geographical location. Such characteristics are only possible if the Earth is flat.

8. Technicians' view.

One of the weighty arguments in favor of their theory is the universal conspiracy of engineers, technicians and other individuals who are in one way or another connected with work in vast spaces. For example, surveyors do not take into account the curvature of the Earth when designing buildings and structures. But in this case, the structure made according to this project simply could not withstand the total load and collapsed. However, this does not happen, and the buildings have stood idle for decades. There is only one conclusion: they know that the Earth is actually flat, but they keep this secret from the population. The same applies to airplane pilots who, taking off from a spherical surface, no longer adjust their flight path until landing. How? After all, under such conditions the plane would have flown into open space. And if you look at it from the point of view of a flat Earth, everything falls into place.

This evidence is the most common that the Flat Earth Society uses to refute the generally accepted theory. In order to judge their loyalty, one must also consider the beliefs of the so-called “sharovists” who adhere to a scientific point of view.

Why is the Earth a ball? Arguments against a flat earth

The concept followed scientific society, provides many justifications in its favor, some of which look quite convincing. What do the Sharover believers talk about in support of their theory?

1. The moon and its eclipse.

Even if we do not take into account photographs that prove the existence of the Moon as a satellite of our planet, the shadow that the Earth casts, gradually reaching lunar eclipse, directly indicates its spherical shape. Even Aristotle, who supported the spherical nature of the planet, considered the cast shadow as an oval, which directly contradicted the theory of the flat shape of the Earth.

2.Change of constellations.

This argument has also been considered since the time of Aristotle. Traveling around the world, he recorded the position of the stars in the sky and the visibility of each of them. So, being at the equator, constellations were revealed to him that were not visible at other latitudes. And the further the scientist was from the equator, the fewer familiar stars he saw, which were replaced by others. This effect could only be explained by the fact that a person is looking at the sky from a spherical surface, otherwise the location would not have such a strong effect on the visibility of the stars.

3.Time Zones.

And although Polskozemeltsy claim that the change of time of day occurs due to the rotation of the Sun, sharovers are sure that it is the Earth that rotates around its axis. That is why in different countries installed different time, and when, for example, it is deep night in America, the sun is shining in China, and the day is in full swing.

4. Force of gravity.

Another proof of a spherical planet is gravity - the force of attraction between objects. According to the laws of physics, it acts relative to the center of mass. But when an apple falls, it lands from top to bottom, and not at an angle to the center, and a person, walking along the surface of the Earth, feels an attraction to the bottom, and not to the side, closer to the center of the “disk”. That is why we can judge that under it every time there is the center of the Earth, from which maximum gravity comes, and this means that the Earth has a spherical shape. However, flat-earthers reject this evidence, because they believe that gravity is just the result of the planet moving upward with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s2.

5.Visibility of objects from above.

If you climb a mountain, tall tree or a lighthouse, looking at the horizon through binoculars, you can notice that the visibility distance increases in direct proportion to the height at which a person is located. Of course, visible obstacles can interfere with the purity of the experiment, but in a field or meadow this effect is most noticeable. But if the Earth were flat, the height of the observation deck would have no effect on the visibility of objects on the horizon. This is only possible if the planet is spherical.

6. Ship on the horizon.

When sailing, the ship does not immediately disappear on a perfectly flat surface of the sea. First of all, its hull is lost from sight, and only after that the sails disappear behind the horizon. The same thing is observed when it approaches the shore: the sails are immediately visible, and only then the ship itself. This directly proves that, despite the apparent straightness of the horizon, it is curved by the spherical shape of the Earth.

7.Sundial.

The sundial effect is calculated based on the shadow cast by the Sun at different times. By sticking a stick into the ground, you can observe how its shadow gradually changes its shape. And if the world were a plane, the position of the stick would not affect the shape of the shadow, and in different points it would be identical. However, even a seemingly insignificant distance of several tens of kilometers between two experimental rods gives different results, and the shadows differ from each other by at least a few tenths of a millimeter. This principle was used even before our era when calculating the circumference of the Earth, which was carried out by Eratosthenes.

8. Documentary facts.

And although flat earthers claim that satellite photographs and space flights- a hoax, sharers are firmly convinced of their existence. Numerous photographs of our planet obtained from outer space, flights to the Moon and exploration of other planets are a scientific heritage that humanity has achieved over hundreds of years of experimentation and development. True, considerable funds are invested in these studies, and their effectiveness is confirmed only by photographs, but this is the other side of the coin.

Flat Earth in the context of contemporary art

No matter how controversial the theory that denies the generally accepted shape of our planet may be, it has repeatedly surfaced in the works of science fiction writers, film directors and writers. It is enough to recall the well-known “Chronicles of Narnia” by Clive Lewis to understand that this idea attracts a wide audience. Narnia cosmology presents the idea of the plane of the Earth, beyond the boundaries of which there is paradise - Aslan. The heroes go there, following the routes of an ancient map reminiscent of a medieval one.

The English science fiction writer Terry Pratchett devoted a whole series of works to the concept with the predictable title Discworld. In his opinion, based on ancient Indian myths, the disc-shaped planet is supported by four elephants, and they, in turn, stand on a centuries-old turtle. And what about Pirates of the Caribbean, beloved by millions of spectators? Captain Jack Sparrow's team was able to reach the end of the planet, where a bottomless waterfall seethed.

This concept was not ignored either domestic writers. Thus, the story “Monk at the End of the Earth” by Sergei Sinyak describes an expedition to the heavenly dome, after which its participants were subjected to repression by the state. However, the results of the expedition were undeniable: space flight is nothing more than a fiction based on a distortion of the picture of the universe.

Afterword

What to believe in, what concept to adhere to is everyone’s personal choice. It is more convenient for some to believe that the Earth is a ball, while others are also unshakably convinced that our planet is flat. One way or another, going up into space to clearly verify the correctness of one of these movements is not possible for most people, so we will have to use what we have - our eyes, logic and common sense. It is enough to close the textbooks, open satellite map and drive along it for a considerable distance, checking the mileage and trajectory with official data. Simple practical experiments will allow you to understand where reality ends and hoax begins.

It is best to end this debate with the words of the wise Dalai Lama: “In any case, all this is very insignificant, isn’t it? The basis of the Teaching is; what they say about the structure of life, about the nature of suffering, about the nature of the mind. These are the basics of the teaching. This is what is most important; something that is directly related to our lives. Whether the world is square or round does not matter much as long as there is prosperity and peace in it.”

UN emblem - flat earth, although it is officially believed that our planet is spherical, and this is what we are taught in schools from childhood. Are we really being misled, and why? We tell children fairy tales and leave them with stereotypical attitudes in the form of morality, so that they do not harm themselves with curiosity. Isn’t it obvious that the same fairy tales are implanted into our consciousness with the help of science? The hypothesis that we live on a flat disk existed long before the eminent Hippocrates, Aristotle and Newton, who presented arguments for the spherical shape of the planet. And this idea was well received by the public, who stopped looking for answers to questions for a long time.

Why the flat earth logo?

The UN Flat Earth emblem is proof that “nothing is hidden from us.” And if adherents of the revolutionary theory nevertheless prove that our planet is not spherical, what will the United Nations be required to do? They can calmly say that all the answers were in front of us in plain sight. Honestly, it’s hard to just believe that we were deceived for so many years, brainwashed for the sake of maintaining order or for some other reason. However, after reading the book 100 Proofs for a Flat Earth, the contradictions do become apparent. Perhaps our ancestors were not mistaken, and we really walk on a flat disk with curved edges upward? Maybe the planet is covered with a dome on top, and the North Pole is in the center? Then there is no South Pole at all, just like in Game of Thrones. Just imagine that the creators of the series presented not fiction, but a real story.

What is the UN hiding?

Photographs from NASA regularly appear online, answering public questions. The problem is that it is impossible to determine the reliability of the information. Perhaps this is falsified data, and there is no moon at all. Here fantasy plays out again, and the tricks of outstanding film studios are remembered. Unconsciously, you begin to think that the whole world has been hidden from us, and we are within the walls of a not-so-objective reality. Of course, maybe we don’t understand something, including the essence of the official UN emblem. However, it definitely makes us think, at a minimum, about the significance of information that we cannot verify. Well, all that remains is to wait for new ones interesting theories and facts from revolutionary astrologers. Perhaps modern progress will still allow us to get to the truth, if it exists.

Hello, friends! What if you found out that there is no space, the earth is flat, and there are several suns? NASA is funded by a secret world government, led by Freemasons, to mislead everyone living on the planet. No one has been in space, the moon is artificial.

Isn't it true, shocking statements that at first glance seem like the ravings of a crazy ignoramus? But don’t rush to twist your finger at your temple.

There is a considerable army of adherents, growing every day, for whom the flat earth theory is not nonsense or pseudoscientific fiction, but, on the contrary, seems to be the only truth.

Supporters of this theory conduct experiments, research, and provide hundreds of significant evidence that we do not live on a geoid ball spinning around its axis and rushing at a speed of 30 km per second around the sun, but on a flat “plate” covered transparent dome.

This topic is incredibly exciting. A thousand and one questions immediately arise: how come the oceans don’t pour out, why don’t we see the sun at night, what about all these photos and videos of space expeditions, planets, the moon, spacesuits, shuttles, lunar rovers, satellites, astronauts? This is what the article will discuss.

Flat Earth Society

At school we were taught that only ancient people believed in such tales. Let's remember where you can find references to a flat earth? In Sumerian, Scandinavian, cosmogonic mythology, among the ancient inhabitants of Egypt, Babylon, Greece, in biblical tales, Vedic literature, in Hinduism and Buddhism.

This all happened in ancient times; in the Middle Ages there were also followers of this theory. In our time, it is generally accepted that the earth has the shape of a sphere, or rather, the shape of a geoid, and all ancient ideas are swept aside and accepted modern science absolutely untenable.

However, this does not mean that everyone has happily abandoned ancient treatises, forgotten about the ideas of their ancestors and believed in school textbooks. There is something called the Flat Earth Society. It originated in England in the 19th century with light hand English inventor Samuel Rowbotham. He conducted various experiments and experiments, during which he saw what he wanted to see - the earth is flat.

Under the pseudonym Parallax, he wrote a small book called “Zetetic Astronomy,” where he outlined in detail the results of some of his experiments and evidence that the earth is not spherical, and the surface of the world’s oceans is a flat plane.

Over the course of several years, the book was reprinted, each time the number of pages in it increased, as did the number of followers of Rowbotham's theory. Parallax himself gave paid lectures, sometimes behaved aggressively, and was even capable of attacking those who dared to disagree with his point of view.

Followers appeared in America and Europe, and the movement subsequently spread throughout the world. Hitler, by the way, was also an adherent of this theory. The most interesting thing is that there are more and more supporters of this idea; society has broken up into several different movements and organizations.

And it doesn’t matter that many scientists have empirically proven the truth of the statement that the earth is spherical, adherents of “ flat theory“They don’t pay attention to this and present their unshakable arguments. Just type the appropriate query in a search engine and voila! A whole heap of videos, facts, evidence, reasoning, refutations, forums, discussions on this topic.

But before we move on to describing the most common and truth-like arguments, let's look at the main postulates of adherents of the flat earth theory:

Imagine a disk in the center of which is North Pole, the diameter of the disk is slightly more than forty thousand kilometers - this is our planet.
The earth is covered with a transparent dome, above which the sun rotates and, like spotlights, this ensures the change of day and night; gravity, in its usual concept, does not exist.
There is no Antarctica, but instead of the South Pole, the edge of the earth is surrounded by an ice wall along its entire circumference.
All photographs from space are fakes, processed in Photoshop or other programs. Spaceships and other devices are made of cardboard and plywood, all trips into space are filmed according to fictitious scenarios on earth.
The dominant point of view about the sphericity of the earth is just a conspiracy sponsored by the Freemasons to hide the truth from the entire population of the planet.
Everyone who knows the truth: scientists, NASA employees, astronauts are funded by Freemasons and are also participants in the conspiracy.

Does the solar system exist?

Let's start with an idea of the solar system, does it look like it was taught in school: in the center is the Sun, around which the planets revolve, the Earth takes third place. Could this be true? According to adherents of the flat earth society, of course not.

Why? Everything is logical: such a model of the solar system could exist if the sun hung motionless in space, but this is not so, because everything moves in space. If everything were like this, then the sun, logically, should fly at enormous speed, and the planets should fly behind it and spin in a spiral, but this cannot be.

Second fact: the force of attraction and repulsion of planets and the sun. The force of attraction allows the planets not to “fly away” from the sun, and the force of repulsion allows them not to collide with each other and stay at a certain distance from the sun.

But the masses of the planets are different. And if solar system would exist in the model that is described in books, then planets with a larger mass should be closer to the sun, and those with a smaller mass further, since the gravitational force for small planets is required much less than for large ones.

Small planets simply would not have enough repulsive force if they were at such a relatively short distance. Thus, our planet would be in sixth place (according to its mass) among other planets, and it would be unrealistically cold on earth.

Evidence and facts

Let’s not bore you and move on to the most interesting part: the evidence and facts held by adherents of the theory that the earth is a flat disk and not a spinning ball.

Does atmospheric pressure not exist?

Let's figure it out. Atmospheric pressure was discovered experimentally by the physicist Evangelista Torricelli, who invented the mercury barometer. He conducted an experiment with mercury and water, thus refuting Aristotle’s assertion that there is no emptiness in nature, that is, vacuum does not exist.

Torricelli proved that a vacuum exists, and that there is also atmospheric pressure, which puts pressure on any body. But this trick doesn’t work with water. Why did it turn out with mercury, it can also turn out with alcohol.

In fact, water barometers also exist, but they are very large, because many times more water is required than alcohol or mercury for it to begin to evaporate. You can read in more detail in books or on the Internet about this experience. Yes, the question still arises: where did Torricelli get a whole bucket of mercury, which is thirteen times heavier than water, and also radioactive? But that is another story.

So, as supporters of the flat earth theory show us, in the case of Torricelli’s experiment, no vacuum was formed in the test tube, and the resulting apparent void, in fact just mercury vapor, which, at a minimum pressure at the very top of the inverted test tube, began to boil at room temperature. That is, it turns out that atmospheric pressure does not exist? And there is no gravitational force in the usual idea either.

The space above the earth does not move anywhere, this becomes clear; adherents of the flat earth theory suggest looking at birds that fly freely, clouds that move depending on the direction of the wind.

And a helicopter or balloon In general, they can hover motionless in the air and their pilots, logically (well, if the earth is spherical and spinning) should see the moving earth below them, but this does not happen.

Then, even a stone thrown up and flying for a few seconds, then falling for a few seconds, should land many meters from the place of the throw if the earth is spinning, but this does not happen. Why? Because the earth is flat, answer adherents of the anti-scientific theory.

Curvature of the earth beyond the horizon

Rowbotham began to conduct these experiments; in our time there have been more of them, and they have diversified. If the earth is a sphere, then there is a curvature, and nothing should be visible beyond the horizon line. But in practice, such tall objects as lighthouses, mountains, statues are visible from distances from which they should be significantly below the horizon line, and, therefore, should not be visible if the earth is spherical.

For example, the Needles Lighthouse, located near Hampshire in the UK, whose height is 54 meters, is visible at a distance of up to 60 kilometers, and the curvature of the earth at this distance is 282 meters. It turns out that the point where the lighthouse is located should be 282 meters below the horizon if the earth is spherical. But this does not happen - the lighthouse is visible from such a distance.

The same situation is with ships that are on the open sea, and we look at them from the shore. An illusion is created that, moving away from the shore, the ship disappears beyond the horizon, which seems to confirm that the spherical earth has a bend.

However, if you take good equipment and adjust the magnifying zoom, the ship that “disappeared over the horizon” will reappear in our field of vision. That is, our vision is limited by the point of perspective dispersion, and not by the horizon line. If you “arm your eyes”, then there will be no horizon line limiting visibility due to the curvature of the earth.

All photographs from space are a hoax, the sky is a dome, stars and the sun, and indeed the whole world is artificial. Airplane windows create the illusion of a rounded earth, but this is an optical illusion. Look at the UN emblem, isn't it a model of a flat earth?

Flights to the moon: truth or grandiose deception

Proponents of the flat earth theory claim that Americans have never been to the moon; for example, consider Apollo 11, in which the inhabitants of the earth allegedly made the first trip to the moon.

If you enlarge the photo, you can see what the “lunar rover” is made of: oilcloth, cardboard, foil, plastic and other materials that are by no means intended to overcome atmospheric pressure, much less travel into space.

Click to enlarge

This is just a model photographed against the backdrop of astronauts, all of whom, without exception, are Freemasons. In some photos, you can even see that on the fingers of the astronauts or on their wrists there are rings or watches with generally accepted Masonic symbols: a compass and a square, inside of which is the letter G.

Where are photographs “from Mars” taken?

The same situation applies to photographs allegedly taken on Mars. Adherents of the “flat theory” argue that images from Mars are actually just processed photographs of the earth’s surface, taken in certain places.

Have you seen pictures from the Red Planet - a rocky, lifeless place? The fact is that if you pass them through a Photoshop filter, you will see that in these pictures there are quite earth's surface, over which spreads blue sky. Such landscapes can be found in many regions of our planet.

Air travel routes

Using the flat earth theory it is easy to explain some seemingly counter-intuitive air travel. For example, from Sydney () to Santiago ( Latin America) it is convenient to fly directly with refueling, for example in New Zealand. But in fact the route passes through North America.

If you look at a round globe, it turns out that the plane in this case makes a strange angle. And if you transfer the same route to a map of a flat earth, you can see that this is a direct, adequate path.

This can be checked on almost any routes, applying which to a map of a flat earth, it becomes clear that such a flight trajectory is very logical and adequate, which cannot be said about them when applied to a spherical model.

Moon, sun, stars

The picture will be incomplete without understanding what the moon, sun and stars really are (or not in reality, but according to adherents of the flat earth theory). Here again we see the statement that all photographs "on the moon" are taken on earth.

The Flat Earth Society even conducts special expeditions, the purpose of which is to search for places on our planet where supposedly space photographs are taken. During such an expedition to Iceland in August 2015, they filmed landscapes exactly like the pictures and videos we are told were taken on the moon.

The astronauts participating in the Apollo program (recall that this was the first manned moon landing, which ended in 1975) each and every one refused to swear on the Bible that they had actually been on the Moon. Fragments of this video are easy to find on the Internet. Some of the astronauts swear, some avoid answering, some rudely send a journalist who asks him to swear on the Bible about the reality of walking on the lunar surface.

We present to you a video that proves that flights to the moon are fiction:

If you collect all the arguments, add to them the data obtained as a result of observations carried out by some alternative researchers, season the information received with knowledge about the flat earth and systematize the material, it turns out that the Moon is not a satellite of the earth, it does not exist in principle. How do we see it? This is a huge hologram hanging from above and updated periodically.

Now let's turn to the stars. It is known that astrology is ancient science and many constellations, for example Big Dipper were discovered thousands of years ago. And during this time the constellations have not changed at all. Isn't it strange if all the bodies in space are constantly moving at huge different speeds?

In addition, if the Earth rotates all the time around its axis, and even around the sun, then why do we see the same stars above our heads on starry nights? After all, the earth turns to them in different directions, besides, it flies around the sun, and the stars “stand rooted to the spot” in the same place. Doesn't this seem absurd? We don’t know about you, but it seems like it to supporters of the flat earth theory. They claim that stars are also holograms.

Now let's deal with the Sun. Is the sun also a hologram? There are many photographs, articles and videos that indicate the presence of not one, but many suns, and they “hang” in different parts above our earth and shine in different ways. There are even transfers with brief descriptions all seventeen suns: starting with the Californian and ending with the Chinese. Of course, scientists will say that this is all nonsense. But let's see how the adherents who believe in a flat earth explain this.

The fact is that the sun cannot have the same color as we see it (from yellow to red). Indeed, according to the official theory, the blue color of the sky is due to the fact that the light of the sun, passing through the atmosphere, is divided into spectra and one of the spectra (blue-blue) colors the sky in this color. Why then does the sun itself appear yellow?

Since we see it through the atmosphere, it should also be colored blue, like the sky. Does this mean that we do not see the sun through the atmosphere? The sun is not above the atmosphere, but much lower and is it not real? What is the result?

The earth has the shape of a disk and is located under a dome from which artificial hologram lamps shine: the moon, the sun, the stars. If you are interested in delving into this topic, then books, videos, and materials distributed by adherents of the flat earth theory are not difficult to find.

Closer to the light source - warmer

Everyone loves to present book proofs based on theories. but no one can answer the simplest question without books.

When we get closer to a heat source, we become hotter. Why is it colder at airplane altitude than on the ground? No, don’t write about the temperatures of a certain layer of the atmosphere, you’re still taking it from books again and haven’t checked it yourself.

Let's actually say that closer to the heat source is warmer. Those. Closer to the sun it should be warmer. But in fact this is not the case. This indicates that the heat source is false. It must be much hotter in space than on earth in direct sunlight.

False World Map (addition)

We are supplementing this article with new information, which we have included in a separate review due to its volume.

- the article clearly examines the sizes of the continents, which are shown by the official source - Yandex.Maps and which strongly contradict the map of the world that we have known since childhood.

Finally, I would like to note that all information for the article was prepared and collected from free sources, the purpose of the article is not to persuade readers to one point of view or another. All material is for informational purposes only and we are interested in what you think about the flat earth theory. Which evidence seems the most powerful, and which one seems to be made up from thin air?

Leading NUMEROLOGIST of Russia JULIE PO about the dome and flat earth

Irrefutable evidence of a flat earth - VIDEO film:

Scientists have proven that the Earth is NOT round - VIDEO facts

VOTE - What kind of Earth?

Article in video format

Share the article with friends, discuss, subscribe to our updates, and we say to you: “see you” and set off in search of new secrets of the universe.

We'd love to hear your thoughts on the flat earth topic in the comments.

It’s painful to see today’s rampant diabolism, which is the work of perverts! Unfortunately, the word "revelry" is not even entirely appropriate. The real one is coming now psychic attack on the brains of Russians. In general, this is the real one psychic warfare! In this article I will not say anything about the propaganda of pederasty in Russia and the world and about the widespread revelry of so-called “homosexuals” in the form of gay pride parades, although this is also one of the powerful factors in the psychic war of the “devil’s seed” against humanity.

Here I want to point out how powerfully, literally as a united front, the “children of the devil” act in their desire to twist the brains of everyone who has very poorly developed thinking and weak logics in reasoning.

This new psychic attack is aimed primarily at such weak-minded people. Everyone else listening to this literally diabolical logic They just twist their finger at their temples and think that all these “lecturer-propagandists” are just nuts. And they, in fact, are not schizos, they are very smart people for evil, and their main goal now is to check how many suggestible people there are in our society, and how many can be put into a state of schizophrenia per hour with the help of such mental attacks X!

So, watch and listen for yourself! This is information that has already been removed from the Internet Boyarshinov Boris Sergeevich, preserved in the Yandex archive:

Today, professor of physical and mathematical sciences Boyarshinov Boris Sergeevich explains to the students that scientists have previously blatantly lied to people, including him, when they say that the Earth is spherical. According to him, the truth is that The earth is flat!

Obvious-incredible?!

The 21st century is here, every sailor or astronaut knows that the Earth is spherical, and this scientist is trying to convince everyone that the Earth is flat, as Catholics did in the Middle Ages in the Holy Roman Empire, being opponents of the heliocentric system?!

If only Boyarshinov alone claimed this! In this case, one could say that the person has gone crazy in his old age! How crazy his mind has gone!

However, the same thing is claimed today by dozens of other “agents of influence” who are in our field of vision and actively use the media!

Look at the next representative of the “children of the devil” sect - Andrei Tyunyaev, a Russian writer and journalist, editor-in-chief of the socio-political newspaper “President”, founder of the non-profit organization “Academy of Basic Sciences “Organizmika””.

Listen to what he says about the shape of the Earth! Andrei Tyunyaev explains that in fact it is not flat, but has the shape of a saucer with edges curved upward, and it seems flat to people due to the phenomenon of refraction in the Earth’s atmosphere. This is the real shape of the Earth according to Tyunyaev!

Tyunyaev A. A., Book of Ra: the origin of letters, numbers and symbols. — M.: White Alva. — 2014.
Tyunyaev A. A., Russian China: export of civilization. — M.: White Alva. 2014.
Tyunyaev A. A., Dikusar V. V., Vacuum: concept, structure, properties // Rep. ed. Corresponding member RAS Yu. A. Flerov. — M.: Computing Center named after. A. A. Dorodnitsyna RAS. — 2013.
Tyunyaev A. A., Moscow - the palace of Mokosha. — M.: White Alva. — 2011.
Tyunyaev A. A., Ancient Rus'. Svarog and Svarog's grandchildren. — M.: White Alva. 2010.
Klyosov A. A. and Tyunyaev A. A., The origin of man (according to archaeology, anthropology and DNA genealogy). — M.: White Alva. 2010.
Proto-language: Experience of reconstruction. (Col. Aut.). — M.: White Alva. T. 1. 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. Periodic table elementary particles// Organism is the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume III, Physics / Ed. D.F.M. Sc., Professor O. A. Khachaturyan. - M.: Sputnik+, 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. Homeologous-chromosomal immunodeficiency syndrome // Organism is the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume III, Medicine / Ed. d.b. Sc., Professor O. D. Doronina. - M.: Sputnik+, 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. History of the emergence of world civilization (system analysis). — M.: 2006—2009.
Evolutionary economics: innovations, investments, institutions, intellectual capital: Collective monograph". Scientifically edited by N. A. Shaidenko and M. P. Pereverzev. - Tula: Tula State Publishing House pedagogical university them. L. N. Tolstoy, 2008. - 460 C, section 1, paragraph 1.5., p. 104-113.
Tyunyaev A. A. Languages of the world ( tutorial). - M.: In, 2007-2008.
Tyunyaev A. A. Organism is the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume I. - M.: In, 2004, 368 p.
Tyunyaev A. A. Organism is a new fundamental science. Started. - M.: In, 2003, 80 p.
Fiction[edit | edit wiki text]
Tyunyaev A. A. Battle for the World Throne (Gospel of Yarila). Novel. - M.: White Alva, 2014. - P. 575: ill. ISBN 978-5-91464-104.
Tyunyaev A. A. Tales from the library of Ivan the Terrible. - M.: White Alva, 2015. - P. 288: ill. ISBN 978-5-91464-124-9.

"Capitals of the World", 2007, 978-5-98034-100-8;
“From writing to the Internet”, 2007, 5-98034-075-0;
“Little Red Riding Hood”, 2007, 5-98034-093-9;
“ABC, counting, colors, notes”, 2006, 5-98034-098-X;
“Home ABC”, 2006, 5-98034-089-0;
"Automotive ABC", 2006, 5-98034-096-3;
“Flower Meadow”, 2006, 5-98034-071-8;
"Antarctic Account", 2006, 5-98034-085-8;
“The ABC of Animals and Birds”, 2005, 5-9640-0262-5; 5-9640-0223-4; 2004, 5-96400069-X;
“Fun Geometry”, 2005, 5-98034-046-7;
“All about water”, 2005, 5-98034-067-X;
“Magic Flight”, 2005, 5-98034-069-6; 5-98034-022-X;
“In the Park”, 2005, 5-98034-043-2;
"Sea Counting", 2005, 5-98034-073-4;
“We play ball”, 2005, 5-98034-037-8; 5-98034-044-0;
“Counting with animals”, 2005, 5-98034-061-0;
“Who has what baby”, 2005, 5-98034-054-8;
“Fruits, berries, mushrooms”, 2005, 5-98034-036-X;
“The ABC of Names”, 2004, 5-98034-058-0;
“Who eats what”, 2004, 5-98034-053-X;
“Traffic Rules”, 2004, 5-98034-059-9;
"Colors", 2004, 5-98034-051-3;
"Color Geometry", 2004, 5-98034-066-1;
“The ABC of Candy”, 2003, 5-98034-046-7;
"Tiger Cub's Birthday", 2003, 5-98034-041-6;
“Mouse’s Birthday”, 2003, 5-98034-031-9;
"Jungle", 2003, 5-98034-018-1;
“What kind of water happens?”, 2003, 5-98034-011-4;
"Cosmos", 2003;
“Who lives in the forest”, 2003, 5-98034-026-2;
“Who is wearing what”, 2003, 5-98034-025-4;
“Forest Tale”, 2003, 5-98034-019-X;
"Machines", 2003, 5-98034-049-1;
“Sea Tale”, 2003, 5-98034-024-6;
"Musical Instruments", 2003, 5-98034-009-2; 2002;
“I’ll draw”, 2003, 5-98034-008-4; 2002.
“The Steam Locomotive and His Family”, 2003, 5-98034-048-3;
"Feathered Friends", 2003, 5-98034-012-2;
“Learning to Speak”, 2003, 5-94582-033-4;
"Formula 1", 2003, 5-98034-038-6;
“Flower Meadow”, 2003, 5-98034-023-8;
"Chocolate", 2003, 5-98034-010-6;
"Frog", 2002;
"Fish", 2002;
"Spiderbugs", 2002.

Another “agent of influence”, a representative of the devilish forces, but this time female - Julie Poe.

Listen now to how she tells the audience flat earth theory:

Julia Poe explains that the distance from the observer's eyes to the Sun is not 150 million kilometers, as is written in all encyclopedic reference books, but only 6 thousand kilometers! That is, the distance from us to the Sun is like from Murmansk to Vladivostok! Just!

About what it is psychic attack goes to the brains of Russians, I realized back in April of this year, when I received this “friendly” letter from a Kontov user with the nickname “Kamen”, who lives in Germany:

“I’m actually a writer, I used to do this. With age and experience, I can say that today I can see almost the entire picture of the universe as a whole, I keep it in a single field of vision, many times I tried to write the most valuable book in our time, I have a lot of information and knowledge in all spheres of life, but... for no one and no reason!

Tweak through the article first on one topic, then on another—not that calico. Information should be presented as in the book of the Apocalypse - absolutely brilliant and divine. This is the word of God himself! Several layers and levels of understanding. In Revelation, after all, the entire history of mankind for 2000 years and a little earlier, as well as for the next 1000 years. From government system, to the legal system and socio-political status of all survivors of the 7th trumpet...

An explanation of Revelation can take up to tens of volumes! But the people are not ready now. Maximum spiritual level—this is faith in some kind of higher intelligence, or even movie planets, Akkunaki, etc. Nobody knows God. And God knows no one! Everything in the matrix is up to the nostrils.

I'm leaving Comte too—I don't care about throwing beads. I recommend that you take up the issue of flat earth—a lot of information, just a lot of stuffing—you need to be able to sift out. Education allows—technical I also have a mathematical mind and am comfortable with physics, astronomy and chemistry.

You can’t even imagine what kind of lies and matrix we live in! Globalism—it's from the globe. At first they said that there is a globe and a heliocentric, they fooled us, in connection with this they said that there is no God and they began to control the cattle. And “they” know what’s what! Now, since there is no God—and everyone is “in the know”, they have discovered the truth about the flat earth, but they are already saying that we were created by movie planets and they say they will soon fly in to sort out the mess. Wait—you'll see how interesting everything will be. Okay, I say goodbye..."

It was in vain that he wrote “about the flat Earth” to me, a former sailor who sailed on ships across the seas and oceans for 20 years! For those who have seen the sea not in candy wrappers, the spherical earth is obvious! That’s why they tried to draw sea maps even in ancient times in such a way that the sphericity of the Earth was reflected as much as possible:

The last card is completely unique! Firstly, it is dated 140 new era. It was compiled by the famous Ptolemy! Secondly, it demonstrates non-flat earth! Thirdly, this map shows that there was more water at the equator than in the circumpolar region, which is currently heavily flooded by the waters of the Arctic Ocean. Obviously, the circumpolar region went under water, which destroyed Hyperborea (by the way, indicated on this map) and gave rise to the legend of the “global flood.” Pay attention to the outlines of India! Now they are different. Fourthly, the current Kola Peninsula was not yet a peninsula! And so on.

As an appendix, the article:

“Think about it! Lack of spirituality fights against spirituality! The task is to corrupt as many people as possible!”

Before astronauts landed on the moon, there was an opinion that the first people on the moon should not leave an American flag there, but a flag representing all of humanity. A very good idea, by the way. However, these few voices were not heard. But in 1970, they pushed James Cadle, who lived on a farm in Illinois, to create the Earth flag.

According to Cadle, the flag should be used to represent humanity as a whole, without division into countries, organizations or individuals. James Cadle dedicated his life to popularizing the flag and sent it to everyone (in exchange for compensation for the costs of making and shipping the flag). Before his death, he transferred the Earth flag into the public domain, so that it can now be freely used and, for example, hung outside the window on public holidays.

Oh yes, the Earth flag looks like this:

There is some symbolism here, isn't it?

So-so! That's not what I meant at all. Stop:

I meant just the Sun, Earth and Moon.

In general, James William van Kirk, a priest from Youngstown (Ohio, USA), was one of the first to develop his peace flag design in 1913 and with this flag twice led peace marches through Europe.

Here is his image:

Another option was proposed by Ann Kirstein Rönhede around 2000. The flag, which was a blue cloth with a blue circle in the center with a white ring surrounding it, symbolizing the Earth, was supposed to symbolize the idea of peace and coexistence. The simplicity of the flag's design was aimed at making it easy to manufacture for everyone.

This is what it looks like:

In 2006, Paul Carroll proposed a version of the flag, which he called the “World Flag,” symbolizing globalization modern world. The P. Carroll flag is a rectangular canvas, in the center of which is a map of the world, surrounded by the flags of 216 countries and territories, as well as the UN flag.

Not really like that, to be honest:

In 2015, Swedish artist Oskar Pernefeld proposed a design for the International Flag of Planet Earth. According to Pernefeld, this flag should be used in future space expeditions (in particular, manned flight to Mars) and is intended to fulfill two main purposes: to represent the planet Earth in space and as a reminder to the people of Earth that we all share this planet, regardless of nationality borders, and must take care of each other and the planet we live on.

The flag is an image of seven rings intersecting each other on a dark blue background. Images of intersecting rings form a flower in the middle, symbolizing life on Earth, and the intersection of rings symbolizes that everything on Earth is directly or indirectly connected. The dark blue background symbolizes the ocean and the importance of water to life on Earth.

The flag of the United Nations, adopted on December 7, 1946, is an image of the official emblem of the United Nations, located in the center of a blue cloth - the color of the UN. This emblem white depicted on both sides of the panel. The UN flag has been used to demonstrate the unity of the world community, although technically it only represents the UN itself. The wide popularity of the image of this flag makes it quite representative for expressing the interests of the planet as a whole.

By the way, I could never understand why on the UN flag the Earth is in the targeting reticle of some weapon? In light of some events, there is a feeling that countries are not being protected at all, but that they are under the gun of the UN.

And this is how the modern younger generation dreams of seeing the Earth flag from the Internet: