Chemistry
How Peter I was replaced. The hidden real history of the tragedy of Russia. Peter the First Who was Peter 1

How Peter I was replaced. The hidden real history of the tragedy of Russia. Peter the First Who was Peter 1

For some reason, many people strongly associate the word “tantra” with sex, and moreover, many believe that it is just an abbreviation of the phrase “tantric sex.” However, this is far from being the truly remarkable feature of this spiritual direction. What is much more interesting is that tantra is a purely elite teaching, especially “tailored” to power.

For some reason, many people strongly associate the word “tantra” with sex, and moreover, many believe that it is just an abbreviation of the phrase “tantric sex.” As a result, almost every specialist on this topic, if he begins to write something popular, is forced to begin his text by exposing the fallacy of such an equation. There is no doubt that tantrism is indeed imbued with sexual symbolism and not only symbolism. However, this is far from being its truly remarkable feature. Gender symbolism, the motive of intercourse and fertilization are characteristic of all cultures and were developed by them to one degree or another. The fact that Tantrism specifically developed this is not so interesting. Something completely different is interesting - tantra is a purely elite teaching, specially “tailored” to power.

Many people do not associate yoga and spiritual psychotechniques with power. It seems as if all yogis simply meditate in forests and monasteries, only caring about their own enlightenment. However, in the East, mastery of spiritual practices, possession of spiritual experience and power are practically synonymous. And there is nothing surprising here.

What did the eastern rulers always need, who were fed up with hundreds, or even thousands of concubines, not to mention everything else? What were they even interested in? They were interested in two things: spirituality as such and what would help them in management. Both were given to them by the sages, and in return, these sages and the traditions to which they by definition belonged received control over the mind of one or another emperor, or even entire generations of rulers. The sages and their traditions needed power to realize their ideas about the ideal world order. At the same time, it should be noted that such ideas about the ideal world order could sometimes be monstrous.

In the West, philosophy exists as something seemingly purely secular and mental (although in reality this is also a big question). In the East there is no philosophy other than religious. Therefore, an eastern sage is always a spiritual guide and preacher, the holder of some kind of spiritual tradition. Actually, these lines of spiritual traditions in a complex way clarified the relationship both with each other and with the authorities, which was and is the most important part of political history.

So, tantra is not “tantric sex”, but in the strict sense of the word, in general, just a certain type of texts. There are sutras and there are tantras. However, these texts, of course, belong to a certain spiritual and philosophical direction, which can be generally called tantra. Relatively speaking, there is Hindu tantra and Buddhist tantra (it is usually called Vajrayana). Why conditional? Here is what Buddhologist Evgeny Torchinov writes in his now classic book “Introduction to Buddhology”:

“Here it is appropriate to point out one significant difference between Buddhist Tantrism and Hindu (Shaivist) Tantrism, which developed in parallel with it. In Buddhism, the feminine principle is prajna, that is, wisdom, intuition of reality as it is and understanding of the nature of samsara as essentially empty states of consciousness; Prajna is passive. In Shaivism, the feminine principle is shakti, that is, strength, energy, unity with which joins the world-creating power of God; shakti is by definition active. The Buddhist-Hindu convergence at the level of yoga has gone so far, however, that in the latest tantras (for example, in the Kalachakra Tantra, early 11th century) the concept of “shakti” appears, which had not previously been used in Buddhist tantras.”

That is, not only did both tantrisms develop in parallel, but also in Kalachakra Tantra we are dealing with their syncretism. Let’s add to this, let’s say, the very high “elasticity” of everything related to gender identification, characteristic of a given culture. So, for example, the bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, whose official reincarnation is the Dalai Lama, can be presented in a male guise, but the matriarchal features in his image are much stronger. But that's not all. Torchinov writes:

“Just as the sexual symbolism of the tantras had its prototype in archaic fertility cults (apparently of Dravidian origin) ancient India, which were radically rethought by Buddhism and became, in essence, derivatives of archaic cults and images, being included in the context of the Buddhist worldview, Buddhist philosophy and psychology, the tantric pantheon was also largely rooted in the cults of archaic deities, the veneration of which was largely preserved in the lower classes and castes of Indian society, as well as among the pariahs (Dombi, Chandala).”

As is easy to see, Hindu and Buddhist tantras have the same source - ancient Dravidian (pre-Indo-European) cults. These cults were associated with the worship of one or another incarnation of “great mothers”, the most famous of which are the goddesses Kali and Durga. Actually, tantrism is, to put it very roughly, the direction that, as it were, further strengthens both in Hinduism and Buddhism the spirit of the ancient dark matriarchy. The strengthening of the influence of this spirit can actually be traced back to the Vedas, and Mircea Eliade called this process “the rise of mothers.”

Sri Devi Nrithyalaya

Located within Hinduism and Buddhism, Tantrism occupies a dominant position within their institutions. The fact is that tantra promises the achievement of the highest religious goal of liberation already in this life, and not like “ordinary” Buddhism and Hinduism - over many births and deaths. If an “ordinary” devout Buddhist or Hindu basically only makes offerings and worship to deities, then a tantricist engages in spiritual practices and achieves certain results - personality transformation. What it is is a separate and little-studied question. But the fact that such earnest practice leads to some results and that the adepts who achieve them occupy the highest levels in the spiritual power hierarchy is beyond doubt.

Moreover, such “architecture” (and this is what we are especially interested in here) has been recorded in many countries. Thus, in all the main Tibetan schools (Nyingma, Kadam, Sakya, Kagyu, and Gelug) there are two different initiations: for “ordinary” Buddhists and for tantric ones. The fact is that tantric practices involve a lot of things that an “ordinary” devout Buddhist should not do. Therefore, when initiated into the tantric direction, the adept cannot swear that he will not do something that an “ordinary” believer should not do. This state of affairs is consolidated in two different “lines” of initiations. As is easy to see, it is the tantric line that is the “elevator” to the higher hierarchies.

The Gelug school of “yellow hats” has long occupied a dominant role in Tibet. At its core is the aforementioned Kalachakra Tantra. The Dalai Lama initiates this tantra personally and quite officially. However, the main thing is that the Dalai Lama is not just a spiritual leader, but a theocratic ruler. That is, he is the power. Moreover, a certain syncretism of Hindu and Buddhist tantras in the person of the Dalai Lama takes place not only due to the fact that Torchinov told us above that “Kalachakra Tantra” inherits the concept of shakti from Hinduism, but also because the Dalai Lama is considered the reincarnation of the bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara . And the image of Avalokiteshvara has a pre-Buddhist prehistory and refers first to Shaivism, and then to that very Dravidian matriarchy.

The main patron saint of Nepal, Saint Matsyendranath, who lived around the 10th century, is revered as an incarnation of Avalokiteshvara. However, he was by no means a Buddhist, but a Shaivite. And the cult of Shiva, as is more or less established today, has a pre-Indo-European genesis.

However, if such syncretism can be considered, relatively speaking, natural (after all, one Indian culture), then the connection of tantra with Confucianism and Japanese Shintoism is unlikely. Nevertheless, the penetration of tantra into China and Japan with many “syncretistic” consequences is an indisputable fact.

As I said above, the tantric tradition was initially “tailored” to a certain type of interaction with power, being able to respond to its irrevocable requests. Already one of the earliest and most significant tantric texts, the Guhyasamaja Tantra (“Tantra of the Innermost Cathedral”) tells the following very revealing story.

Once upon a time there lived an Indian king, Indrabodha, and he had 500 concubines. And then he sees someone flying past him. He learns that it is the Buddha along with his five hundred disciples. Buddha tells him about his teaching, about asceticism and that the whole world is an illusion and is filled with suffering. The king admired the Buddha's sermon, but noted that, although he was ready to become a Buddhist, he was a ruler and must fulfill his “earthly” duties, and his 500 concubines would be bored without him. After this, he asked Buddha if, within the framework of his teaching, it was possible to somehow combine the above and the below. To which the Buddha replied that this was quite possible, and told the king the Guhyasamaja tantra in detail.

Both the Chinese and Japanese emperors could not refuse this. What is happening today in modern China and Japan is a separate question. But it is a fact that the line of tantric Buddhism of the Shingon school moved to Japan from China, and managed to fool the Chinese authorities.

It was brought to Japan by the famous monk Kukai in 804. He studied with the monk Hui Guo. Hui Guo was a disciple of Amoghavajra, and he in turn was a disciple of Vajrabodhi. And Amoghavajra, and Hui Guo, and many of Vajrabodhi’s disciples (for example, the monk I-Hsing) served in one capacity or another under the Chinese emperors. And sometimes they were kind to them, sometimes they fell into disgrace.

As a result, one way or another, Taoist-Buddhist syncretism developed in China, which generally repeated the spiritual-power “architecture” that I spoke about above. Only in China did Confucianism play the role of “ordinary” Buddhism and Hinduism.

What Confucius worshiped is still not known exactly. Most likely it was Tao. The main thing is that Confucius forbade even being interested in metaphysical questions. That is, Confucianism, in principle, is a teaching about the correct performance of rituals, but, as it were, without a metaphysical “head”.

Regarding this feature of Confucianism, the famous orientalist Alexey Maslov expressed himself scathingly and definitely: “Confucianism is an epistemological “dummy”, an absolute volume that can be filled with almost any content.”

By the time the tantrists came to China, the role of this “content”, the metaphysical “head” was played by the Taoists, who then entered into complex relations with the adepts of tantric Buddhism who came.

A little later, this “construction”, in which Tantra is at the top and Confucianism at the bottom, migrated to Japan along with the teachings of the Shingon school.

In the article “Ritual structure of relations between the emperor and the Buddhist sangha in Japan in the Heian era (X - XII centuries) (based on the example of the Buddhist ceremonies of Misae and Misyuho),” orientalist Elena Sergeevna Lepekhova writes:

“On the one hand, the emperor symbolically donated his kingdom in the form of his clothes to the Buddha, his teaching and the sangha, on the other, during the ritual of “empowerment” he received back his robe and through the consecration of cintamani scented water, he was transformed from an ordinary ruler into a universal ruler. chakravartin and a member of the universal family of the Buddha Tathagata."

Quote from the video by Lepekhov E.S. Classification of Buddhist teachings in the Tendai school and the theory of Lawrence Kohlberg. Let's save Tibet

That is, the Shingon tantric school initiated the Japanese emperor into ideal Buddhist rulers, chakravartins, giving him the Cintamani pearl. What relation the Japanese emperor had to the national religion of Shinto after this ceremony, and whether he had it at all, would require separate consideration.

As a result, we can say that the spiritual and political structure of power in the East implied that at the bottom there would be some kind of teaching that required only the fulfillment of rites and rituals, and at the top there was already a “powerful” tier. This tier was usually filled with tantrics. As for the West, such “architecture” could not, sooner or later, fail to attract some part of its elite. For me, one of the obvious promoters of such “architecture” in the West was Dante Alighieri, for whom Roman law began to play the role of Confucianism or “ordinary” Buddhism or Hinduism. However, this issue requires separate consideration...

VKontakte Facebook Odnoklassniki

One of the reasons that gave rise to the version of the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky

The beginning of these studies was the discoveries made during the study of an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Thanks to the study of the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, scientists have found that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

Scientists have compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table it was revealed that the official birthday of Peter I does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a blatant contradiction in comparison with all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Rus' during baptism were given exclusively according to the calendar, and the name given to Peter breaks the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time.

Photo by Stan Shebs from wikimedia.org

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, based on the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isaac. This explains the name of the main cathedral. Tsarist Russia. Thus, the Brockhaus and Efron dictionary says: “St. Isaac’s Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great.”

Image from lib.rus.ec

Let's look at the following obvious ones historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the replacement of the real Peter I with a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothing. Two surviving portraits of the tsar from that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The Tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia who wore exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including the attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to European canons of development.

2. There are quite good reasons to doubt the difference in the body structure of Peter I and the impostor. According to exact data, the height of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It is worth noting that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The height difference of 34 cm stands out very much from the overall picture of real kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered extremely a rare occurrence. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real Tsar and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the newly minted impostor.

3. In Godfried Kneller's portrait of Peter I, which was created during the Tsar's stay in Europe, a distinct mole is clearly visible. In later portraits the mole is missing. This is difficult to explain by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of the location of the library was passed from tsar to tsar. Thus, Princess Sophia knew where the library was located and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible contained rare publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. Interesting fact is also the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of people accompanying the tsar was 20, and the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returning embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of Dutch subjects. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy went to Europe with the tsar for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new tsar did not meet with his relatives or his inner circle. And then in a short time different ways got rid of his immediate family.

7. Sagittarius - guard and elite tsarist army- they suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The Streltsy revolt that began was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the Streltsy were the most advanced and combat-ready military units that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Sagittarius became by inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units.

Image from swordmaster.org

It is characteristic that the scale of the destruction of the Streltsy was more global than according to official sources. At that time, the number of Streltsy reached 20,000 people, and after the pacification of the Streltsy revolt Russian army was left without infantry, after which a new set of recruits was made and a complete reorganization of the active army was carried out. A noteworthy fact is that in honor of the suppression of the Streltsy revolt, a commemorative medal was issued with inscriptions on Latin, which had never before been used in the minting of coins and medals in Rus'.

Image from oboudnoda.org

8. The imprisonment of his legal wife Evdokia Lopukhina in a monastery, which the tsar did in absentia while at the Grand Embassy in London. Moreover, after the death of Peter, Lopukhina, by order of Catherine I, was transferred to the Shlisselburg fortress, which was famous for its harsh conditions of detention. Subsequently, Peter would marry Marta Samuilovna Skavronskaya-Kruse, a native of the lower classes, who after his death would become Empress Catherine I.

Image from wikimedia.org

Now let's look at the greatest steps the newly-minted tsar took for Russia.

All official versions claim that Peter I was the greatest reformer who laid the foundations for the formation of the most powerful Russian Empire. In fact, the main activity of the impostor was to destroy the foundations of the former statehood and spirituality of the people. Among the most famous great "acts" of Peter there are both famous and little known facts, testifying to the true appearance and reforms of the new king.

- Introduction of the Russian form of slavery- serfdom, which completely limited the rights of peasants both on old and conquered lands. In one form or another, the consolidation of peasants has existed since the 15th century, but Peter I carried out a tough reform in relation to the peasants, completely depriving them of their rights. A remarkable fact is the fact that neither in the Russian North nor in Siberia serfdom has not become widespread.

- Carrying out tax reform with the introduction of a strict tax system. At the same time, small silver coins began to be replaced with copper ones. Having created the Ingermanland Chancellery, headed by Menshikov, Peter introduced ruinous taxes, which included taxes on private fishing, wearing a beard, and baths. Moreover, adherents of the old rituals were subject to double tax, which served as an additional incentive for the resettlement of the Old Believers to the most remote places of Siberia.

- Introduction to Rus' new system chronology, which put an end to the countdown of time “from the creation of the world.” This innovation had a strong negative impact and became an additional incentive for the gradual eradication of the original Old Believer faith.

- Transfer of the capital from Moscow to the newly built St. Petersburg. Mention of Moscow as an ancient sacred place is found in many sources, including Daniil Andreev in his work “Rose of the World”. The change of capital also served to weaken spirituality and reduce the role of the merchants in Rus'.

The destruction of ancient Russian chronicles and the beginning of rewriting the history of Rus' with the help of German professors. This activity acquired a truly gigantic scale, which explains the minimal number of surviving historical documents.

- Refusal of Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and the introduction of the new alphabet of Cyril and Methodius, which consisted of 43 characters. With this, Peter dealt a severe blow to the traditions of the people and stopped access to ancient written sources.

- Cancellation of Russian measurements, such as fathom, elbow, vershok, which subsequently caused dramatic changes in traditional Russian architecture and art.

- Reducing the influence of the merchant class and the development of the industrial class, who was given gigantic powers, even to the point of creating his own pocket armies.

- The most brutal military expansion into Siberia, which became the forerunner of the final destruction of Great Tartaria. At the same time, a new religion was implanted in the conquered lands, and the lands were subject to severe taxes. The time of Peter also saw the peak of the looting of Siberian graves, the destruction of holy places and the local clergy. It was under Peter's rule in Western Siberia Numerous detachments of mound workers appeared, who, in search of gold and silver, opened old burials and plundered holy and sacred places. Many of the most valuable “finds” made up the famous collection Scythian gold Peter I.

- Destruction of the system of Russian self-government- zemstvos and the transition to a bureaucratic system, which, as a rule, was headed by hirelings from Western Europe.

- The most severe repressions against the Russian clergy, the virtual destruction of Orthodoxy. The scale of repression against the clergy was global. One of Peter’s most significant punishers was his close associate Jacob Bruce, who became famous for his punitive expeditions to Old Believer monasteries and the destruction of ancient church books and property.

- Widespread distribution of narcotic drugs in Rus' that cause rapid and sustained addiction - alcohol, coffee and tobacco.

- Complete ban on growing amaranth, from which both butter and bread were made. This plant not only improves human health, but also prolongs life by 20-30%.

- Introduction of the provincial system and strengthening of the punitive role of the army. Often the right to collect taxes was given directly to the generals. And each province was obliged to maintain separate military units.

- The actual ruin of the population. So, A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky point out that according to the 1678 census, 791,000 households were subject to taxation. And the general census conducted in 1710 showed only 637,000 households, and this despite the fairly large number of lands subordinated to Russia during this period. It is typical, but this only affected the increase in tax taxes. Thus, in provinces where the number of households was decreasing, taxes were collected according to the data of the old census, which led to the actual plunder and destruction of the population.

- Peter I distinguished himself for his atrocities in Ukraine. Thus, in 1708, the hetman’s capital, the city of Baturyn, was completely plundered and destroyed. More than 14,000 people out of the city's 20,000 population died in the bloody massacre. At the same time, Baturin was almost completely destroyed and burned, and 40 churches and monasteries were looted and desecrated.

Contrary to popular belief, Peter I was by no means a great military leader: de facto, he did not win a single significant war. The only “successful” campaign can only be considered the Northern War, which was rather sluggish and lasted for 21 years. This war caused irreparable damage to the Russian financial system and led to the virtual impoverishment of the population.

One way or another, all of Peter’s atrocities, called “reform activities” in official versions of history, were aimed at the complete eradication of both the culture and faith of the Russian people, and the culture and religion of the peoples living in the annexed territories. In fact, the newly-minted tsar caused irreparable damage to Russia, completely changing its culture, way of life and customs.

Associated with the life and death of great Russians. This is the death of the son of Ivan the Terrible, Tsarevich Dimitri, and the execution of the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II, and the poisoning of I.V. Stalin. At the same time, the substitution of Peter I - is it fiction or historical fact, has been repeatedly discussed by historians and has three different options.

The main versions of the substitution of Peter I

The least conspiratorial hypothesis that Tsar Peter I was replaced by a double was put forward by V. Kukovenko, co-founder historical society city of Mozhaisk, and I. Danilov, head of the “Philosophical Assault” project. According to their assumption, during the second amusing “Semyonovsky” campaign in 1691, the young tsar was mortally wounded during a horse attack or a shootout. A similar accident happened before. A year earlier, during a training exercise, a grenade exploded in the hands of a soldier, burning the face of Peter I himself and his comrade-in-arms, General Patrick Gordon. Those close to Peter, led by the boyar Fyodor Romodanovsky, previously noted the undoubted resemblance to the tsar of the Dutch shipwright Yaan Mush, a Saardam carpenter who arrived in Russia to build an amusing fleet. F. Romodanovsky and the commander of the opposing amusing army, “Generalissimo” I. Buturlin, saving themselves from the death penalty and their relatives from repression, replaced Peter I with a Dutch master, who was 4...5 years younger than the tsar.

The most convincing and justified hypothesis is that proposed by the “subverters” of the modern view of historical science and the developers of the “New Chronology” academician Russian Academy Sciences A.T. Fomenko and associate professor of Moscow State University G.V. Nosovsky. They were the first to note that Peter's official date of birth did not correspond to the day of his angel. If the king had really been born on May 30, 1672, then he should have been named Isaac. It was in honor of this name, the real name of the person who replaced the king, that the main church cathedral was named Russian Empire. At the same time, the historian P. Milyukov, who wrote an article about the first Russian Emperor for the Brockhaus and Efron encyclopedia, hinted in a veiled form that Russia, starting in 1698 - the year of Peter I’s return from the Great Embassy, was ruled by an impostor.

The following facts support this hypothesis:

the tsar sent his wife, queen Evdokia, who bore him a son, Alexei, to a monastery during his trip to Europe before returning to Russia;
before Peter I entered Moscow, the remnants of the Streltsy army were destroyed, and the Streltsy died near Moscow during a battle with an unknown army, under the command of boyar Shein, about whom no more historical records have been preserved;
before entering Moscow, the Russian autocrat secretly meets with the Polish king and pays him an “indemnity” (according to other sources, a “subsidy”) of 1.5 million gold efimki, which was equal to annual income Moscow State;
Having returned to Moscow, Peter unsuccessfully tried to find the library of Sophia Paleologus, the location of which was known only to persons of royal blood and which Princess Sophia repeatedly visited;
shaving of beards, Western European dances and entertainment, and the introduction of Western customs into everyday life began only after the sovereign’s return from the Grand Embassy.

There are two versions of the replacement of Peter I with a double during a trip to Western Europe:

St. Petersburg mathematician Sergei Albertovich Sall believes that the double of the Tsar of Muscovy was a prominent freemason and relative of William of Orange, the first king of England and Scotland and the only representative on the British throne from the Nassau-Oran dynasty;
according to the historian Evgeniy Trofimovich Baida, the double was either a Swede or a Dane named Isaac (hence the St. Isaac's Cathedral) and professed the Lutheran religion.

However, checking the versions of whether this event was a substitution of Peter, a fiction or a historical fact, can be resolved quite simply. To do this, it is necessary to take, during the next planned restoration of the tomb of Peter in the Peter and Paul Cathedral, a particle of genetic material, and it will immediately become clear that there have been substitutions, and theories about who was the father of the first Russian Emperor - Tsar Alexei Fedorovich or Patriarch Nikon, will be confirmed or refuted. whose connections with Peter’s mother, Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, were maligned by his contemporaries.

One of the reasons that gave rise to the version of the substitution of Tsar Peter I was the research of A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky

Photo by Stan Shebs from wikimedia.org

A. Fomenko and G. Nosovsky, based on the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, is Isaac. This explains the name of the main cathedral of Tsarist Russia. Thus, the Brockhaus and Efron dictionary says: “St. Isaac’s Cathedral is the main temple in St. Petersburg, dedicated to the name of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, whose memory is honored on May 30, the birthday of Peter the Great"

Image from lib.rus.ec

All lifetime portraits of Peter 1

Let us consider the following obvious historical facts. Their totality shows a fairly clear picture of the replacement of the real Peter I with a foreigner:

1. An Orthodox ruler was leaving Russia for Europe, wearing traditional Russian clothes. Two surviving portraits of the tsar from that time depict Peter I in a traditional caftan. The Tsar wore a caftan even during his stay at the shipyards, which confirms his adherence to traditional Russian customs. After the end of his stay in Europe, a man returned to Russia who wore exclusively European-style clothes, and in the future the new Peter I never put on Russian clothes, including the attribute obligatory for the tsar - royal vestments. This fact is difficult to explain with the official version of a sudden change in lifestyle and the beginning of adherence to European canons of development.

2. There are quite good reasons to doubt the difference in the body structure of Peter I and the impostor. According to exact data, the height of the impostor Peter I was 204 cm, while the real king was shorter and denser. It is worth noting that the height of his father, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov, was 170 cm, and his grandfather, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, was also of average height. The height difference of 34 cm stands out very much from the overall picture of real kinship, especially since in those days people over two meters tall were considered an extremely rare phenomenon. Indeed, even in the middle of the 19th century, the average height of Europeans was 167 cm, and the average height of Russian recruits at the beginning of the 18th century was 165 cm, which fits into the general anthropometric picture of that time. The difference in height between the real Tsar and the false Peter also explains the refusal to wear royal clothes: they simply did not fit the newly minted impostor.

3. In the portrait of Peter I by Godfried Kneller, which was created during the Tsar’s stay in Europe, a distinct mole is clearly visible. In later portraits the mole is missing. This is difficult to explain by the inaccurate works of portrait painters of that time: after all, portraiture of those years was distinguished by the highest level of realism.

Image from softmixer.com

4. Returning after a long trip to Europe, the newly-minted tsar did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding the library was passed from tsar to tsar. Thus, Princess Sophia knew where the library was located and visited it, and the new Peter repeatedly made attempts to find the library and did not even disdain excavations: after all, the library of Ivan the Terrible contained rare publications that could shed light on many secrets of history.

5. An interesting fact is the composition of the Russian embassy that went to Europe. The number of people accompanying the tsar was 20, and the embassy was headed by A. Menshikov. And the returning embassy consisted, with the exception of Menshikov, only of Dutch subjects. Moreover, the duration of the trip has increased many times over. The embassy went to Europe with the tsar for two weeks, and returned only after two years of stay.

6. Returning from Europe, the new king did not meet with his relatives or his inner circle. And subsequently, in a short period of time, he got rid of his closest relatives in various ways.

7. The Sagittarius - the guards and elite of the tsarist army - suspected something was wrong and did not recognize the impostor. The Streltsy revolt that began was brutally suppressed by Peter. But the Streltsy were the most advanced and combat-ready military units that faithfully served the Russian tsars. Sagittarius became by inheritance, which indicates the highest level of these units.

Image from swordmaster.org

Peter I and the whole truth about the substitution!

(The difference in the photo is 2 years)
Studying historical facts and events that were carefully hushed up and kept secret, we can definitely say that Peter I was replaced on the throne by an impostor. The replacement of the real Peter I and his capture occurred during his trip to Amsterdam along with the Grand Embassy. I tried, by copying, to bring together in this post various sources confirming this tragic fact history of Russia.

The person leaving with the embassy is a young man of twenty-six years old, above average height, thickly built, physically healthy, with a mole on his left cheek, with wavy hair, well educated, loving everything Russian, an Orthodox (or more correctly, orthodox) Christian, who knows the Bible by heart and etc. and so on.

Two years later, a man returns who practically does not speak Russian, who hates everything Russian, who never learned to write in Russian until the end of his life, having forgotten everything he knew before leaving for the Grand Embassy and miraculously acquired new skills and abilities, without a mole on his face. left cheek, with straight hair, a sickly man who looked forty years old.

Isn't it true that somewhat unexpected changes occurred with the young man during his two years of absence.

What is curious is that the papers of the Grand Embassy do not mention that Mikhailov (under this name young Peter went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, but for the embassy officials it was no secret who “Mikhailov” actually was.

A man returns from a trip, sick with chronic fever, with traces of long-term use of mercury drugs, which were then used to treat tropical fever.

For reference, it should be noted that the Grand Embassy traveled along the northern sea route, while tropical fever can be “earned” in southern waters, and even then only after being in the jungle.

In addition, after returning from the Grand Embassy, Peter I, during naval battles, demonstrated extensive experience in boarding combat, which has specific features that can only be mastered through experience. Which requires personal participation in many boarding battles.

All this together suggests that the man who returned with the Great Embassy was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas.

Before the trip, Peter I did not take part in naval battles, if only because during his childhood and youth, Muscovy or Moscow Tartaria had no access to the seas, with the exception of White Sea, which simply cannot be called tropical. And Peter I did not visit it often, and only as an honorary passenger.

During his visit to the Solovetsky Monastery, the longboat he was on was miraculously saved during a storm, and he personally made a memorial cross for the Archangel Cathedral, on the occasion of salvation in the storm.

And if we add to this the fact that his beloved wife (Queen Eudokia), whom he missed and often corresponded with when he was away, upon returning from the Grand Embassy, without even seeing her, without explanation, he sent to a nunnery .

In the work of D.S. Merezhkovsky's "Antichrist" the author noted a complete change in the appearance, character and psyche of Tsar Peter I after his return from the "German lands", where he went for two weeks and returned two years later.

The Russian embassy accompanying the Tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted only of the Dutch (including the well-known Lefort), only Menshikov remained from the old composition.

This “embassy” brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed the substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise the archers against the impostor. As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gate of the Kremlin, the impostor exiled the wife of Peter I to a monastery, where she never reached, and summoned his own from Holland.

False Peter killed “his” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty immediately, although the official history tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed his youngest son, Alexei, as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

=======================

Peter the impostor made such transformations with Russia that it still comes back to haunt us. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

He crushed Russian self-government - the “zemstvo” and replaced it with a bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously instilled it here;

He transferred the ownership of the peasants to the nobles, thereby turning them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this “event” is blamed on Ivan IV);

He crushed the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

He crushed the clergy, the carriers of Russian culture, and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

Introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

Destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

He ordered all Russian chronicles to be taken to St. Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. Called on German “professors” to write a completely different Russian history;

Under the guise of fighting the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who had lived for more than three hundred years;

He forbade the cultivation of amaranth and the consumption of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, which destroyed longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;

He abolished the natural measures: fathom, finger, elbow, vershok, which were present in clothing, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

He replaced the Russian title system with a European one, thereby turning the peasants into an estate. Although “peasant” is a title higher than the king, as there is more than one evidence of;

He destroyed the Russian written language, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the writing of Cyril and Methodius;

He disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the Streltsy as a caste with their wonderful abilities and magical weapons, and in the European manner introduced primitive firearms and piercing weapons, dressing the army first as French and then as German uniform, although Russian military uniform was herself a weapon. The new regiments were popularly called “amusing” ones.

But his main crime was the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create three people subtle bodies that he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions a man was made into a universalist who could, from his bast shoes to spaceship, to do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the impostor, people in Russia did not know what wine was; he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and given to the townspeople for free. This was done to jog my memory past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of infants born who remembered their past lives and could speak continued. Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of babies who had the memory of a past life placed a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves were reluctant to call Peter great for a long time. And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, supposedly brought there from America. Nightshades (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe before Peter the Great. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by the great diversity of species, which took more than one thousand years. On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word “witchcraft” is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits*, corresponding to the 108 Russian gods.

After Peter, there remained only a few sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially severely destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of man. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was to allow the cultivation of potatoes (Orthodox Old Believers do not use them for food), sweet potatoes and earthen pears, which are rarely eaten today. The destruction of sacred plants that were consumed at a certain time led to the loss of the complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its time”). Moreover, the mixing of nutrition has caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people, instead of fragrance, exude a stench. Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain: “root of life”, lemongrass, zamanikha, golden root. They contributed to a person’s adaptation to difficult conditions and kept a person youthful and healthy. There are absolutely no metamorphosing plants left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance; about 20 years ago, “Sacred Coil” was found in the mountains of Tibet, and even that has disappeared today.

* Today, the word “fruit” is understood as a unifying concept, which includes fruits, nuts, berries, which were previously called simply gifts, while gifts of herbs and shrubs were called fruits. Examples of fruits include peas, beans (pods), peppers, i.e. a kind of unsweetened herbal fruit.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at the present time, kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, and it is prohibited to grow poppy. Of many sacred gifts, only names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: gruhva, kaliva, bukhma, lily of the valley, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigva, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya back in the 19th century meant a pear, although these were completely different gifts; today these words are used to describe the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb used to denote the mudra of the heart, but today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, fig and fig were no longer grown because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians. Already in Lately Proska began to be called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals disappeared forever from human agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I? He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to deliver the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity. Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic brethren of Europe, called to fight, together with Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decided to go over to Charles’s side), won a victory near Poltava. The real Russian Tsar Peter I was captured again and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was placed over his face, which caused a lot of speculation in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem that if you killed the real Peter, there would be no hassle. But that’s the point, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, they would not have succeeded. Russian-Swedish war, nor Russian-Turkish, which in fact were civil wars, which led to the formation of two new states: Turkey and Sweden, and then several more. But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and said that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor. And against this background, it was no longer difficult for the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlözer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, to declare all the Dmitry kings False Dmitrys and impostors, not having the right to the throne, and some not They managed to criticize, they changed the royal surname to Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which forms the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (self-power).

For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people without clergy, i.e. the power of the best was replaced by the power of anyone.

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, but in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as we know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to the opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on the stick, but also on the carrot, but man on our planet is rated lower than animals by the conquerors.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitory laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which established a balance between incentives and prohibitions. Let us remember how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: “They had all the laws in their heads.” Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of kon, from where the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to kon) came to us. Guided by the principles of kon, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. A principle is always higher than a law because it contains more possibilities than a law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word. The word “law” itself means “beyond the law.” If a society lives by the principles of law, and not by laws, it is more vital. The commandments contain more than the story and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of con.

As the wonderful Russian thinker I.L. wrote. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the delights of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, resting on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other after 20-30 years. However, let’s give him the floor: “Professor Wipper is not entirely right when he writes that modern humanitarian sciences- this is only “theological scholasticism and nothing more”; this is something much worse: it is deception. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals beckoning us into mass graves hunger and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external defeat.

The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’A-Lambert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940. The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also completed its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the entire cycle: there is famine, there is terror, there have been wars, both internal and external, but defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, another payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for the swamp lights , kindled by our rulers of thoughts over the most rotten places of the real historical swamp.”

The philosophers listed by Solonevich did not always come up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often suggested to them.

V.A. Shemshuk “The Return of Paradise to Earth”
======================

“With other European peoples you can achieve goals in humane ways, but with Russians - not so... I am not dealing with people, but with animals, which I want to transform into people” - a similar documented phrase of Peter 1 very clearly conveys his attitude towards the Russian people.

It’s hard to believe that these same “animals,” in gratitude for this, nicknamed him the Great.
Russophobes will immediately try to explain everything by saying that yes, he made people out of animals and that’s the only reason why Russia became Great and the “animals” who became people gratefully called him the Great for this.
Or maybe this is the gratitude of the Romanov owners for the perfectly fulfilled obligations to destroy precisely the traces of the greatness of the Russian People, which haunted those who wanted to create for themselves Great History, the ruling circles of states that until recently were provincial outlying provinces?
And it was precisely this very Greatness of the Russian People that did not allow them to create it?

========================================

One can talk a lot and interestingly about Peter I. For example, today it is already known that his short but intense reign actually cost the Russian people more than 20 million lives (read about this in N.V. Levashov’s article “Visible and Invisible Genocide”). Maybe this is why the man called today Peter I is now declared “great”?

Anyone interested in this topic can also watch the video:

The film “Peter and Peter” is just a few answers to hundreds of questions about the real deeds of the one who today is called Peter “the great”. This is an attempt to pose the most necessary questions and search for truthful answers to them, and not the stupidity and obvious lies that our historians and politicians give. The film is based on materials from academician N.V. Levashova, E.T. Baida and some other authors...