Computer science
Onegin and Lensky. Eugene Onegin and Vladimir Lensky: friends or enemies Relationship between Onegin and Lensky

Onegin and Lensky. Eugene Onegin and Vladimir Lensky: friends or enemies Relationship between Onegin and Lensky

Literature helps us learn to distinguish good from evil and understand people. “Eugene Onegin” undoubtedly reveals to the reader the secrets of the human soul.
A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” amazes not only with the perfection of its form, beauty and ease of language, but also with the variety of issues raised in this work.
The author talks about this important issue as a perception of life. A. S. Pushkin writes about two ailments characteristic of the 20s of the 19th century—disappointment in life and an idealistic departure from reality. They are reflected in the images of Onegin and Lensky. These heroes are the best people eras that are trying to find the meaning of life. They are not satisfied with either the empty social life or the primitiveness of village everyday life.
Evgeny and Vladimir are brought together by what sets them apart from the local nobles: intelligence, breadth of interests and education. These traits determined the mutual interest of the heroes and laid the foundation for their friendship.
But Lensky and Onegin differ in many ways from each other, as indicated by

137743 people have viewed this page. Register or log in and find out how many people from your school have already copied this essay.

/ Works / Pushkin A.S. / Evgeny Onegin / Onegin and Lensky

See also the work “Eugene Onegin”:

We will write an excellent essay according to your order in just 24 hours. A unique essay in a single copy.

What do the heroes of A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” read and what do they argue about?

A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” is a unique work in its coverage of Russian reality in the first decades of the 19th century. It is difficult to find an area of life that would not interest the poet. A. Pushkin recreated an entire historical era, drew full picture life of various layers of Russian society. Not a single detail escaped the poet’s attention: from the novel, as from an encyclopedia, you can find out how people dressed and what was in fashion in early XIX century, get acquainted with the repertoire of theaters and the menu of famous restaurants. A truthful and detailed depiction of modernity was necessary to solve the main task - explaining the character of the new man. Among the numerous main and secondary factors that shape the worldview and value system of the characters, A. Pushkin especially highlights the reading range and topics of conversation in which the characters in the novel participate.
Each character has their own library. The selection of literature depends on the intellectual needs and characteristics of the cultural environment in which the characters move. Evgeny Onegin is a Russian European, a man of extraordinary intelligence and remarkable abilities. Although A. Pushkin speaks very ironically about the nature of his hero’s upbringing and degree of education, Onegin can hardly be accused of ignorance. He expanded his knowledge, tried to keep up with the times, listened to the troubling questions of our time and assimilated ideas that penetrated into Russian society from the pages of European books. In the first chapter, the poet notes that Onegin “left the books,” but Tatyana, getting acquainted with his library, saw that “many pages kept the sharp mark of the nails” and “the lines of the pencil” of Eugene. The number of works that Onegin was “excluded from disgrace” included Byron’s poems, novels by French romantic writers, “which reflected the century and modern man depicted quite accurately.” In the heroes of these works, Eugene found similarities with himself. Getting to know them helped him understand himself.
Onegin was interested in the economic problems of the era of the victory of the bourgeoisie over feudalism, so his “sharp, cooled mind” preferred Adam Smith, an authoritative scientist among the progressive nobility, who considered the breaking up of serfdom to be the primary task in Russia. The hero was not indifferent to social problems, and entered into heated “courageous” debates about French politicians and educators, “about the Carbonara, about the Guys.” Participation in such conversations characterizes Onegin as a person attentive to all the pressing issues of his time, to new directions in European philosophical and social thought.
Once in the village, Evgeniy could find a worthy interlocutor only in Lensky. Both heroes, against the everyday background of the provincial nobility, should have felt lonely. Despite the serious differences between Onegin and Lensky, they had common cultural interests, common topics for conversations. Pushkin talks about heated arguments between friends:

11498 people have viewed this page. Register or log in and find out how many people from your school have already copied this essay.

Onegin and Lensky: comparative characteristics

Lensky and Onegin are opposed to each other throughout the entire novel, which is deliberately and openly emphasized by the author himself:

They got along. Wave and stone
Poetry and prose, ice and fire

Lensky is a romantic, an idealist. He poetizes his beloved Olga, his friendship with Onegin, and life in general, which he sees only in an ideal light. He is pleasant to talk to, helpful with ladies and behaves freely with men. Studying in Germany radically influenced his worldview. His head is filled with the philosophical dogmas of German romanticism, which he does not think to doubt. He sees poetry as his calling, and has chosen his beloved as his muse. However, he does not have sufficient insight, sobriety and at least some life experience, so he does not notice Olga’s slight recklessness, narrow-mindedness and his too mediocre, imitative poems, perceiving them as quite serious literary creativity.

Lensky has a lot of vital energy, a passionate imagination and an enthusiastic attitude towards the world, he is cheerful and harmonious. Not yet fully matured, he is childishly quick-tempered, spontaneous and firmly convinced that he is right on every issue and, like an adult, is serious in his intentions and bold in his decisions.

Onegin, his complete opposite, is devoid of any idealism, his cold mind is rather pessimistic and sarcastically negative. He, unlike Lensky, is fed up with the world around him, little excites or touches him, he has difficulty finding sources of pleasure, and even suffers from the dullness of life. Having received intermittent knowledge from various fields in childhood, he continued his studies at balls and receptions, learned the skillful art of communicating with ladies, the art of seduction, witty small talk and acquired a refined taste and the ability to recognize newfangled trends.

This life experience, although very specific, shaped his character and worldview. He is not able to admire coquettes, seeing their feigned seriousness and emptiness; he cannot admire life, knowing how much deceit and pretense there is around. All this led to absolute laziness of the body and mind, to complete indifference to everything in the world, to cruelty and coldness of heart.
It would seem how two such different young people could become good friends.

Why did they become friends? Perhaps such different views on life provided a huge field for discussion and debate, and they, as is known, gathered in the evenings and stayed late in conversations. The narrow village social circle probably also contributed. Who else to talk to in the wilderness, what else to do in the evening. At the same time, both young men, due to their youth, had a common need - the need to reason and reflect, no matter whether these were the romantic thoughts of Lensky or the arrogantly mocking views of Onegin. Finding an interlocutor who can understand what you are talking about, challenge or agree with you is no less important, if not more important, than finding your like-minded person.

Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” amazes not only with the artistic perfection of its form, beauty and ease of language, but also with the variety of problems that worried Russian society in the 20s of the 19th century. Depicting all groups of the nobility, the poet makes an unmistakable diagnosis of the two most common diseases of the century - disappointment and idealistic withdrawal from reality. They are embodied in the images of Onegin and Lensky - the best people of the era. These heroes are not satisfied with either the cold shine of an empty social life, or the squalor and primitiveness of village everyday life. Both of them strive for something higher, trying to find the meaning of life.

What brings these heroes together? Probably, what sets them apart from the usual landowner environment: intelligence, education, breadth of interests, nobility. It was these traits inherent in the heroes that aroused their mutual interest and laid the foundation for their friendship.

They got along. Wave and stone
Poetry and prose, ice and fire
Not so different from each other.

The dissimilarity between the characters of Lensky and Onegin only strengthened their mutual sympathy and added depth to their communication. The friends' conversations are not at all similar to the usual "eternal conversation about rain, about flax, about the barnyard" among village landowners. Their inquisitive and inquisitive mind strives to understand the meaning of life, touching all spheres of human existence.

Everything gave rise to disputes between them
And it led me to think:
Tribes of past treaties,
The fruits of science, good and evil, And age-old prejudices, And fatal secret coffins, Fate and life in their turn Everything was subject to their judgment. Pushkin emphasizes here that the disputes of his heroes affect philosophical, economic, political, and moral problems, which worried the leading people of that time. A quick list of the topics of debate between Onegin and Lensky contains an indication of specific authors who raise these questions in their works.

Among the Russian intelligentsia, the treatise of the French philosopher and writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau “The Social Contract” was very popular, which dealt with one of the most pressing problems government system the relationship between the government and the people, who had the right to overthrow the government that violated the agreement between the union of power and the community of free citizens. Serfdom in Russia created not only political, but also economic difficulties, from which progressive-minded nobles tried to find a way out, introducing improved farming techniques on their estates and using machine technology. The owner of factories and waters Onegin and the rich landowner Lensky could not help but think about this question, which Pushkin calls “the fruits of science.”

“Good and evil,” that is, ethical problems, also became the focus of attention of young Russian intellectuals. Theoretical moral principles are refracted in the characters of friends, determining not only their views, but also their actions.

The history of the relationship between Onegin and Lensky shows the huge difference between them, emphasizing the opposition not only of their characters, but also of their attitude to reality, to the people who surround them. Even Lensky’s penchant for poetry, the desire to express his moods and dreams in poetry speaks of the romantic mood of his thoughts and feelings. He sees the ideal in pretty, empty Olga. Belinsky noted that Lensky “decorated her with virtues and perfections, ascribed to her feelings and thoughts that were not in her.” And friendship with Onegin means a lot to Vladimir. This conclusion can be drawn from Pushkin’s words about what Lensky’s idea of friendship, honor, and nobility was:

He believed that his friends were ready to accept shackles for his honor and that their hand would not waver to break the slanderer’s vessel. This means that his relationship with people was determined by his belief in eternal friendship, in the only love that was predetermined for him by fate, in a noble freedom-loving idea that “one day will illuminate us and give us bliss to the world.” Here Lensky’s connection with Decembrist sentiments clearly emerges, giving reason to assume that he could get closer to the progressive noble intelligentsia, which was preparing the uprising of December 14, 1825, and become the poetic voice of his people. Precisely because faith in love, friendship and freedom constituted the essence and purpose of life for Lensky, he perceived Onegin’s unfortunate joke as a betrayal of his beloved girl and a betrayal of his best friend. And he rushes into a duel to defend the purity of his romantic ideas from Onegin’s skepticism.

Lensky's death is symbolic; it involuntarily leads to the idea that an idealist, romantic, dreamer who does not know reality must die when confronted with it.

But the skeptic and realist Onegin remains to live. He cannot be accused of idealism and ignorance of reality. No, he knows life and people very well, accurately determining their inner essence at the first meeting. But what does this knowledge give Onegin? Nothing but boredom, melancholy, disappointment, consciousness of his superiority over people. And this is a dangerous path, leading to disunity with the world, to selfish loneliness. Therefore, it seems, Onegin cannot become either happy or useful to society. This is his tragedy, which the brilliant artist saw with his sensitive eyes.

This means that the images of Onegin and Lensky are a reflection of two different paths taken by the best noble intelligentsia of the first quarter of the 19th century. And they could end either in death or in a dead end in life.

Lensky and Onegin: comparative characteristics. Onegin and Lensky, table

Ah, dear Alexander Sergeevich! Has your pen written anything more perfect than the living and eternal novel “Eugene Onegin”? Didn’t you put most of yourself, your frantic inspiration, all your poetic passion into it?

But weren’t you lying, oh immortal classic, when you said that Onegin has nothing in common with you? Aren't his character traits characteristic of you? Isn’t it your “blueness” on him, isn’t it your disappointment? Is it not your “black epigrams” that he scribbles on his enemies?

And Lensky! Really, how similar he is to you, the young lover! At you - the other, at the you that you no longer dared to openly reveal to the world...

Lensky and Onegin. Comparative characteristics both of them are yours, oh immortal Alexander Sergeevich, a motley and living portrait on the wall of poetry. Do you agree with the idea of such audacity?

However, be that as it may, allow, in view of your silence, each admirer of your genius to draw their own conclusions, letting their own imagination fly.

We will compare and contrast two bright heroes of “Eugene Onegin”, barely touching the facets of your personality directly. In order to avoid obsessive parallels between you, sir, and the characters in your poem, we will make every effort to make a dry statement of their striking characteristics.

Characteristics of Onegin and Lensky

So, Onegin. Handsome, smart, stately. In the description of his St. Petersburg daily routine, dear Alexander Sergeevich, we find your lines about no less than three hours spent by him preening at the mirrors. You even compare him to a young lady dressed like a man, hurrying to a ball. Perfume, lipstick, fashionable haircut. Dandy, pedant and dandy. Always elegant in clothes. And, by the way, it will be said, nails, sir... He, like you, sir, spends a lot of time at the dressing table, caring for them.

Alas, all the actions he performs on himself in order to be attractive are just a tribute to social habit. He has long cooled off towards the opposite sex, disappointed in love. He doesn't want to please women at all. No! Love has long been replaced by the “art of seduction,” which, however, does not bring any satisfaction.

Social events had long ago lost all taste for him. He often goes to balls, but out of inertia, out of boredom and having nothing to do. The social circle is boring for him. Everything is disgusting, tired! But, not knowing any other life, he continues to live out his usual way of life. No friends, no love, no interest in life.

Onegin’s way of thinking, worldview – you, Alexander Sergeevich, subject everything to the merciless “Russian blues”, or depression. Immeasurable inner emptiness, lack of dreams, boredom, joylessness. At the same time, the liveliness of a cold, sober mind, the absence of cynicism, nobility.

You emphasize his prosaic nature by his inability to “distinguish trochee from iambic,” and his preference for Scott Smith, with his political economic books, only confirms the presence of non-poetic, precise thinking.

What evil muse visited you, Alexander Sergeevich, when you brought your so different heroes together in friendly bonds? Could the relationship between Lensky and Onegin not lead to tragedy? Your Lensky...

Handsome, but beautiful in a different way than Onegin. You endow him with natural beauty of facial features, long, dark, curly hair. With the inspired gaze of a poet and a living, warm heart, open to the world.

Vladimir Lensky is sensitive to the perception of nature and the universe as a whole. “Suspecting miracles” in everything, he understands and feels the world in his own way. An idealist, truly!

An eighteen-year-old dreamer in love with life firmly believes in the existence of his soulmate, who is waiting and yearning for him. Into faithful, devoted friendship and the “sacred family,” as you, venerable Alexander Sergeevich, deigned to call the Holy Trinity.

Describing the relationship between Onegin and Lensky with your own pen, you compare them with the union of water and stone, fire and ice, poetry and prose. How different they are!

Lensky and Onegin. Comparative characteristics

It was your pleasure, Lord of the Muses, to play these two beautiful young men in a sad game that to this day encourages the reader to sprinkle tears on the pages of your great novel. You will bring them together through friendship, at first “out of nothing to do,” and then closer. And then cruelly...

No, it's better in order. So, they get closer: Lensky and Onegin. A comparative description of these two heroes, so characteristic of your time, Alexander Sergeevich, can only be complete when describing their friendship.

So, contradictions occur, as stated English proverb. At first, they are boring to each other due to the dissimilarity of their judgments. But a little later this difference turns into a magnet that attracts opposites. Each thesis becomes the cause of lively debates and discussions between friends, each dispute turns into a subject of deep thought. Perhaps none of them accepted the position of a comrade, but they also retained interest and respect for the flow of other people's thoughts. Listening to Lensky, Onegin does not interrupt him with his youthfully naive judgments, poems and ancient legends. Being a disappointed realist, he is in no hurry to reproach Vladimir for idealizing people and the world.

Daily joint horse rides, dinners by the fireplace, wine and conversations bring young people closer together. And, at the same time, over time, similarities between Onegin and Lensky are revealed. By endowing them with such striking features, you, the master of the pen, take them out of the usual circle of rural communication, with boring conversations about the kennel, your own relatives and other nonsense. The education of the main characters, which is one of the few common features of both of them, makes them yawn in the circle of the rural nobility.

Onegin is five or six years older than Lensky. This conclusion can be reached based on what you indicated, dear Alexander Sergeevich, about his twenty-six years at the end of the novel. When, bending his knees, he cried with love at her feet. at Tatiana's feet. But no. Everything is in order.

Oh, great expert on the human soul, oh, the most subtle psychologist of deep feelings! Your pen reveals dead soul Onegin is the bright, pure ideal of a young maiden - Tatyana Larina. Her young, tender passion spills out before him in a frank letter, which you attribute to him to keep for the rest of his life as evidence of the possibility of sincerity and beauty of feelings in which he no longer believed. Alas, his moping, hardened heart was not ready to reciprocate. He tries to avoid meeting with Tatyana after a conversation with her, in which he denies her high feelings.

In parallel with this discordant love, you develop Vladimir Lensky’s feelings for Tatyana’s sister, Olga. Oh, how different these two loves are, like Lensky and Onegin themselves. A comparative description of these two feelings would be superfluous. The love of Olga and Vladimir is full of chaste passion, poetry, and youthful inspiration. The naive Lensky, who sincerely wishes his friend happiness, tries to push him into Tatyana’s arms, inviting him to her name day. Knowing Onegin’s dislike for noisy receptions, he promises him a close family circle, without unnecessary guests.

Oh, how much effort Eugene makes to hide his furious indignation when, having agreed, he ends up at a provincial ball with many guests, instead of the promised family dinner. But more than that, he is outraged by Tatyana’s confusion when he sat down in the place prepared for him in advance... opposite her. Lensky knew! Everything is set up!

Onegin, truly, did not want what your, Alexander Sergeevich, inexorable pen had in store when he took revenge on Lensky for his deception! When he carried his beloved Olga into his arms in a dance, when he whispered liberties in her ear, he pretended to look tenderly. Cynically and short-sightedly appealing to the jealousy and contempt of the young poet, he obediently followed the fate you had destined for both of them. Duel!

Both have already moved on from stupid insults. Both were already having difficulty finding a reason for a duel. But no one stopped. Pride is to blame for this: no one intended to be branded a coward by refusing a fight. The result is known. The young poet is killed by a friend's bullet two weeks before his own wedding. Onegin, unable to indulge in memories and regrets about the death of the only person close to him, leaves the country...

Upon his return, he will fall in love with the matured and blossoming Tatiana, only now a princess. Kneeling before her, he will kiss her hand and pray for love. But no, it’s too late: “Now I’ve given it to someone else and I’ll be faithful to him forever,” she will say, crying bitterly. Onegin will be left completely alone, face to face with the memories of love and a friend killed by his own hand.

Duels of the creator Onegin and quite appropriate parallels

You were reproached, dear Alexander Sergeevich, for insufficient grounds for a duel between your heroes. Funny! Didn’t your contemporaries draw parallels between these two young men and yourself? Didn’t they notice the similarities between such opposite Onegin and Lensky with your contradictory, dual nature? This borderline split into Lensky - an inspired poet, a superstitious lyricist - and a secular rake, a cold, tired Onegin. didn't they find it? To one you give your fiery genius, love, cheerfulness and, without knowing it, your own death. The other is given unhappy love, wanderings, alienation and, in the end, a long trip abroad, which you yourself dreamed of so much. The characterization of Onegin and Lensky is a comprehensive disclosure of yourself, isn’t it? And if such an obvious similarity between both heroes and you, dear classic, was exposed by your contemporaries, didn’t they know what easy, insignificant reasons for duels were enough for you yourself? And how many times in every week of your life have you started playing with death, fearlessly and indifferently looking at the cold trunk in the hands of your enraged opponent?

Onegin and Lensky meet in the village. As Pushkin writes, they came together “out of nothing to do.” What brings these heroes together? Probably, what sets them apart from the usual landowner environment: intelligence, education, breadth of interests, nobility. It was these traits inherent in the heroes that aroused their mutual interest and laid the foundation for their friendship.

They got along. Wave and stone
Poetry and prose, ice and fire,
Not so different from each other.

Everything gave rise to disputes between them
And it led me to think:
Tribes of past treaties,
The fruits of science, good and evil,

And age-old prejudices,

And the coffins of the fatal secrets,

Fate and life in their turn -

Everything was subject to their judgment.

Pushkin emphasizes here that the disputes of his heroes affect philosophical, economic, political, and moral problems that worried the progressive people of that time.

Lensky's death is symbolic; it involuntarily leads to the idea that an idealist, romantic, dreamer who does not know reality must die when confronted with it.

Hello dears.
It's been a while since you and I remembered our Eugene Onegin :-))) You probably miss us, huh? :-)))
Last time we stopped here with you: Shall we continue? :-)))
Let's go.....:-))))

He listened to Lensky with a smile.
The poet's passionate conversation,
And the mind, still unsteady in judgment,
And an eternally inspired gaze -
Everything was new to Onegin;
He's a cooling word
I tried to keep it in my mouth
And I thought: it’s stupid to bother me
His momentary bliss;
And without me the time will come;
Let him live for now
Let the world believe in perfection;
Forgive the fever of youth
And youthful heat and youthful delirium.

D. Belyukin. "Vladimir Lensky"

Everything gave rise to disputes between them
And it led me to think:
Tribes of past treaties,
The fruits of science, good and evil,
And age-old prejudices,
And the grave secrets are fatal.
Fate and life in their turn,
Everything was subject to their judgment.
The poet in the heat of his judgments
I read, having forgotten myself, meanwhile
Excerpts from northern poems,
And indulgent Evgeniy,
Although I didn’t understand them much,
He listened diligently to the young man.

Küchlya

This is a modern piece, right? Nothing changes - everything is still the same, still the same, still about the same :-)))
Although, to be fair, these lines contain not just the symbolism of the word, it is also a reflection of the numerous disputes that Pushkin once had with his friend Wilhelm Küchelbecker, thereby Küchle. And these disputes were not simple, but, as they say, about.... By “Tribes of Past Treaties” is meant a treatise by J.-J. Rousseau "On the Social Contract". The essence of this work is the affirmation of the emergence of a social union through a free agreement, which finds its expression in a contract (pacte social); supreme power belongs to the people; it is expressed in the legislative power; the executive branch merely applies the law. Violation of this principle leads to tyranny and violates the social contract. Revolutionary ideas, which in turn led to French Revolution. The younger and hotter Lensky supports Rousseau's position, while Evgeniy is more pessimistic.

“The Fruits of Science” is again the same Rousseau. This is his reasoning of the Dijon Academy: did the development of sciences and arts contribute to the improvement of morals
But “Good and Evil” and “age-old prejudices” are from the works of another thinker and student of Rousseau-Weiss. He has a work called “On Prejudice.” In the kennel in this case Onegin and Lensky argue about religious superstitions.
To briefly summarize, we can say that in a few lines the author gave a hint of the fashionable and serious political and religious disputes that took place in those years.

And, finally, by “excerpts of northern poems” we mean, first of all, the poem “Ossian, son of Fingal” by D. Macpherson, the works of Milton, Klapstock. But also other poems of the Scots and Scandinavians, imbued with romanticism and complacency. Once again Lensky is shown as a young and romantic idealist.
But let's move on...

But more often they were occupied by passions
The minds of my hermits.
Having left their rebellious power,
Onegin spoke about them
With an involuntary sigh of regret.
Blessed is he who knew their worries
And finally he left them behind;
Blessed is he who did not know them,
Who cooled love with separation,
Enmity - slander; sometimes
Yawned with friends and with my wife,
Jealous, not bothered by torment,
And grandfathers' faithful capital
I didn’t trust the insidious two.

When we come running under the banner
Prudent silence.
When the flame of passions goes out
And we start to laugh
Their willfulness, or impulses
And belated reviews -
The humble are not without difficulty.
We love to listen sometimes
The passions of strangers are a rebellious language,
And he moves our hearts.
That's right, an old disabled person
The diligent ear willingly inclines
The stories of young mustaches,
Forgotten in his hut.

D. Belyukin "Onegin in St. Petersburg"

Very cool lines. Everything is very much on topic so far :-)) Very much. However, the author does not shy away from passion, a term he constantly repeats in the text. It seems to show that although Evgeniy is more experienced, his passions have not yet cooled down.

But also fiery youth
Can't hide anything.
Enmity, love, sadness and joy
She's ready to talk.
In love, considered disabled,
Onegin listened with an important look,
How, loving confession of the heart,
The poet expressed himself;
Your trusting conscience
He innocently exposed.
Evgeniy found out without difficulty
His love is a young story,
A story full of feelings,
Not new to us for a long time.

Favorite newspaper of Nicholas II

Disabled here in the sense in which the term was used in the 19th century - veteran. Although it turned out ambiguous, yes :-)))

Oh, he loved like in our summer
They no longer love; as one
The Mad Soul of the Poet
I am still condemned to love.
Always, everywhere one dream,
One common desire
One familiar sadness.
Nor the cooling distance,
Nor long summers of separation,
This watch is not given to the muses,
Nor foreign beauties,
No noise of fun, no science
The souls in him have not changed,
Warmed by virgin fire.

In general, an idealist, a romantic, and...a virgin. Although well educated and talented. This is our Lensky :-)
To be continued....
Have a nice time of day.

Onegin and Lensky are absolutely opposite people. They have different characters and temperaments. But despite this they are friends.

Lensky, is a romantic young man. He loves his fiancée Olga very much and believes in friendship with Onegin. The young man was used to idealizing everything. Lensky knows the rules of etiquette and constantly pleases women. He studied in Germany. He is like a poet, writes poetry and draws inspiration from Olga.

Lensky is not a perceptive person; he cannot soberly assess the people around him. The young guy doesn't have enough for this life experience. He believes that he is engaged in serious poetry, but in fact he is not. The young man is also unable to consider the primitive mind of his chosen one.

Lensky is full of energy and admires the world. He has his own point of view on any issue. Lensky can defend his position.

Onegin is the antipode of Lensky. He is calm and does not show excessive emotionality. He treats everything with sarcasm and distrust. He was tired of his usual everyday life. His life seems boring and uninteresting to him. He sees nothing as a source from which to draw inspiration.

Onegin received his education at home. Therefore, his knowledge was fragmentary. All his main time he attended balls and social receptions. It was here that he learned to make witty jokes and treat people courteously, especially women. Onegin could seduce any lady; he did it easily and naturally. The guy is not serious about flirtatious girls. He considers them empty and stupid. In secular society he sees only falsehood and lies. Due to the fault of his surroundings, Onegin's soul became hardened over time.

Despite the fundamental differences in the character of Pushkin A.S. made the two heroes friends. They constantly argued with each other because of their different views on life. Lensky and Onegin could communicate in the evenings. They still had common feature. Both guys loved to communicate, think and talk about various topics. They were not like-minded people, but they always had something to talk about and argue about. Life forced them to fight a duel. The guys couldn't avoid it.

I liked their friendship. There was no hypocrisy or deception between them. They weren't afraid to tell each other their opinions.

Option 2

In his works, Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin wrote more than just about characters, wrote more than just an interesting plot, and wrote more than about pressing problems. Each of Pushkin’s works can rightfully be called one of the most important phenomena in Russian and world literature. In them the author told interesting story, in which there were very colorful characters, and which carried an amazing idea, which no one dared to express at that time. That is why Pushkin is called one of the most brilliant authors, who with their creativity could change not only their country, but also the whole world, and the work “Eugene Onegin” is an excellent example of this.

In the work, Pushkin tells us a wonderful story that tells of a strong, true friendship, but also tells of a terrifying betrayal and a confrontation between two proud people, which, unfortunately, ends in death. Pushkin created a truly unique atmosphere in the work, which every reader, having familiarized himself with the work, could clearly and clearly interpret. Thus, we see a fairly well structured work, which, with its unique atmosphere, somehow inspired the reader to be quite productive in any activity. Because this work re-read very often, it simply gave the reader motivation and purpose in life, a truly great purpose.

In the work itself central images are the image of Onegin and Lensky. Onegin and Lensky are two friends, with the same philosophies and life beliefs, who at first became very attached to each other during their friendship, but after that an event occurs that provokes two young people, and a duel occurs between them, as a result of which Lensky is killed . However, no matter how terrible it is this event, it was still very predictable, since Onegin has a very bad character, and also has the habit of taking revenge on everyone for his grievances, even his best friend, Lensky. Lensky, on the contrary, is trying to correct his friend, trying to tell him about the best virtues of the human person, but he doesn’t give a damn about everything and decides to behave as he pleases.

Thus, Pushkin placed two images into his work at once, which, although very different, are still somewhat similar.

Comparison of Onegin and Lensky

Evgeny Onegin and Vladimir Lensky are friends, but absolutely different people. Everyone has their own vision. Both friends have good education, they know how to behave correctly in public, they can support any conversation. Both characters are very interesting personalities.

Evgeny Onegin - a young man noble family. From an early age he was surrounded by loving and caring governesses and luxurious conditions. I never needed anything. Onegin is an egoist who does not think about the feelings and experiences of the people around him. He does anything because he knows that he can get away with anything. Once, in this way, he ended up in a duel with Lensky. Onegin decided to seduce Olga in order to show her frivolity. In the end, he only angered his friend.

Onegin has knowledge in all sciences. The only thing is that they are all superficial. The hero can carry on any conversation. Moreover, he often does not understand what he is talking about. But it looks very smart. Evgeniy is a critic and skeptic. He flatters and ingratiates himself a lot with other people. Sincerity is alien to this hero. Onegin is fluent in French, Eugene knows a foreign language better than his native one. In the aristocracy, French was valued much more than the Russian language. If a person does not know French, no one will communicate with him. Onegin is always in search of himself, and is not capable of any work. Immediately he starts to get bored.

Vladimir Lensky is the complete opposite of Onegin. Vladimir is a romantic, dreamer and poet. He writes poetry and is interested in literature and philosophy. The hero studied in Germany. Now he has a rich fortune. Lensky values love and true friendship most of all. Lensky is young and tall moral ideals. He falls madly in love with Olga, not realizing that it is impossible to build a happy family with her. Vladimir reacts very ardently to his friend’s flirting with his beloved. Without thinking twice, Lensky challenges Onegin to a duel. He never expected such an outcome. Guided by other motives, Evgeniy tries to explain the truth to his friend.

Both heroes have no specific plans for the future. They live for today. Young people are beautiful, educated and smart. Young and naive Lensky is very pleasant to talk to. Easily fits into any society. Onegin belongs to the category of superfluous people. With his views and criticism, he cannot take root anywhere. People are annoyed by his behavior and moralizing statements. The characters are more different from each other.

Essay Comparative characteristics of Onegin and Lensky

In the novel, Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin wrote more than symbols, wrote more than just interesting novel, wrote about his real problems. All Pushkin’s works can be called the most important in world and Russian literature. In them he outlined interesting events, which in turn had various advantages and expressed an incredible idea, while no one dared to express it. Therefore, Pushkin is mentioned as one of the most remarkable authors who, with his talent, can change not only the country, but the whole world, and the work “Eugene Onegin” is an excellent example of this.

In this work, Pushkin tells the story of betrayal and strong friendship before him, two proud and strong people, which, unfortunately, ends fatally. Pushkin creates his own atmosphere for creativity and everyone who reads can live in it. We see a fairly well-structured work of art, with its own atmosphere, which inspires the reader to be moderately productive in any activity. So this project, which is often read, simply gives the reader purpose and motivation in life, these are great things.

The main characters in the work are Lensky and Onegin. These were two friends with a similar philosophy, who at first were very close to each other, but then a terrible event occurs that provokes the two young people into a duel between them, in which Lensky dies. However, it was very predictable, since Onegin had a bad character and thought about how to take revenge for every insult, even against his best friend Lensky. Lensky, on the contrary, wanted to improve him, wanted to tell him, but Onegin condemned him and decided to behave as he wanted.

Pushkin added these images to the work, although they are very different, they are somewhat similar. Everyday moments of life, relationships between people in Pushkin’s era, and much more from his time are reflected in the work “Eugene Onegin”. Numerous techniques are used in this work. artistic expression: epithets, metaphors, artistic details, anaphors, epithets, comparisons, personifications, metonymies, allegories, grotesques, - and other techniques. An “artistic detail” is also used to make the work even more expressive. Descriptions of interior items, characters' clothing, nature, furniture and other things are details carefully described by Pushkin.

Essay 5

A.S. Pushkin in his work “Eugene Onegin” shows in the images of Onegin and Lensky the most pressing problems in Russian society at the beginning of the 19th century.

They are undoubtedly the best people of their era, who are looking for their purpose in life, they are not satisfied with the primitive social life or ordinary village everyday life, they are looking for something of their own, special.

Evgeny Onegin, like most of his peers, best years spend in theaters, at balls, looking for love adventures. But the hero quickly realizes that all this is pointless and time is wasted. He was raised like a real aristocrat. Quite educated and smart. He is well acquainted with classical literature, the works of Byron and Adam Smith. Unlike Lensky, he failed to become a romantic. At one point, he loses the meaning of life, he is bored and tired of everything, his soul was looking for something special that would add color to his life.

In Vladimir Lensky, the author shows a different type of secular youth. And this is the complete opposite of Onegin. Lensky is also a nobleman who received an excellent education in Germany. He believes in love, sincerity, decency, friendship. His world is full of dreams. He looks at life through rose-colored glasses and looks for beauty everywhere. He does not like social balls, but he does not refuse, from time to time, to usefully spend an evening there.

Onegin and Lensky are united by a focus on their supposedly unique nature.

Evgeny is attached to Vladimir in his own way, but at the same time communicates with him out of boredom. For Lensky, friendship is something more, rather even a need. He firmly believes in devotion, the only love, the purity of human intentions, and this faith, rather, is the meaning of life. That is why he perceives his friend’s fatal joke as betrayal, the infidelity of his beloved girl, and goes to a duel in order to defend the purity of his spiritual ideas from Onegin’s skepticism.

Lensky dies, unable to withstand the blows of life. The author shows by what is happening that such romantics and dreamers, when faced with reality, suffer from it.

But the cynic Onegin remains to live, only life is now full of suffering and longing for a friend. He knows life very well, understands people, feels their nature, but all this does not make him happy man, but only leads to melancholy and disappointment. This is the path to loneliness, to uselessness in society. This is his tragedy, his life's dead end.

Popular writings

New Year's chores - essay (4th grade, Russian)
I love the New Year's bustle. At this time, you really enjoy your worries and expect something magical. After all New Year- this is a grandiose holiday for the whole world and just good time for a miracle.
Essay Man of Honor
Honor has always been an integral part of a decent person. Let's remember the times Russian Empire, when for the slightest word, which purely theoretically could overshadow a man’s honor, his opponent faced a duel to the death
Mitrofanushka's essay in Fonvizin's play Nedorosl (Image and Characteristics)
From the very beginning we get to know one of the main characters, Mitrofan, who is the only son in the Prostakov family. Just from his name you can understand that he is very similar to his mother